Posted By |
Message |
suvenR
designer mutt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15916/15916f5d7c8cf6c0e4ace50ca44fa128bc0684b7" alt=""
Member since 5/05 4239 total posts
Name:
|
.
Message edited 10/4/2006 11:11:22 PM.
|
Posted 5/6/06 9:56 AM |
|
|
nrthshgrl
It goes fast. Pay attention.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba915/ba915e97a19e3eb386b320716091c34ce3ea3247" alt=""
Member since 7/05 57538 total posts
Name:
|
Re: POLL: what's more effective: using a recruiter or doing your own job search?
I would say for most jobs doing your own search. For executive level, definitely a headhunter.
eta. For the techies, my company uses mainly headhunters.
Message edited 5/6/2006 10:48:46 AM.
|
Posted 5/6/06 10:12 AM |
|
|
SweetestOfPeas
J'taime Paris!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdcd8/fdcd8e8e2e418efd0cc1cf88d610836c9bd30c0b" alt=""
Member since 3/06 32345 total posts
Name:
|
Re: POLL: what's more effective: using a recruiter or doing your own job search?
Posted by nrthshgrl
I would say for most jobs doing your own search. For executive level, definitely a headhunter. I agree... even for non executive positions, you have nothing to lose by using a head hunter. the company that hires you pays them, so I say, why not use them?
Message edited 5/6/2006 10:36:58 AM.
|
Posted 5/6/06 10:36 AM |
|
|
MrsRbk
<3 <3 <3 <3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e1eb/6e1ebd0d1e26a78f59f269ff7e67686f92c49da8" alt=""
Member since 1/06 19197 total posts
Name: Michelle
|
Re: POLL: what's more effective: using a recruiter or doing your own job search?
I Agree
When I was looking I did both and had better results on my own.
|
Posted 5/6/06 11:35 AM |
|
|
Potentially Related Topics:
Currently 512044 users on the LIFamilies.com Chat
|