Posted By |
Message |
suvenR
designer mutt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0af1/b0af10b98c6783cc4887c655f9aee1dbf67f689e" alt=""
Member since 5/05 4239 total posts
Name:
|
.
Message edited 10/4/2006 11:11:22 PM.
|
Posted 5/6/06 9:56 AM |
|
|
nrthshgrl
It goes fast. Pay attention.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80dee/80dee3c8dc1a480b24d719804a7848aa6befa5af" alt=""
Member since 7/05 57538 total posts
Name:
|
Re: POLL: what's more effective: using a recruiter or doing your own job search?
I would say for most jobs doing your own search. For executive level, definitely a headhunter.
eta. For the techies, my company uses mainly headhunters.
Message edited 5/6/2006 10:48:46 AM.
|
Posted 5/6/06 10:12 AM |
|
|
SweetestOfPeas
J'taime Paris!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f64b5/f64b56479710d2a1e36e42e07c6da2f6a58ca94e" alt=""
Member since 3/06 32345 total posts
Name:
|
Re: POLL: what's more effective: using a recruiter or doing your own job search?
Posted by nrthshgrl
I would say for most jobs doing your own search. For executive level, definitely a headhunter. I agree... even for non executive positions, you have nothing to lose by using a head hunter. the company that hires you pays them, so I say, why not use them?
Message edited 5/6/2006 10:36:58 AM.
|
Posted 5/6/06 10:36 AM |
|
|
MrsRbk
<3 <3 <3 <3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1c44/e1c44b9aba47cf3ac74463a16ee67fdf926e5d29" alt=""
Member since 1/06 19197 total posts
Name: Michelle
|
Re: POLL: what's more effective: using a recruiter or doing your own job search?
I Agree
When I was looking I did both and had better results on my own.
|
Posted 5/6/06 11:35 AM |
|
|
Potentially Related Topics:
Currently 758390 users on the LIFamilies.com Chat
|