Posted By |
Message |
skew
LIF Adult
Member since 5/05 6794 total posts
Name:
|
Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
i feel SO sorry for these people. the house has been in the family for 60 years and they lost it all due to a mortgage scam.
article
|
Posted 4/28/06 8:05 AM |
|
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
MrsERod
Praying for Everyone.
Member since 5/05 26170 total posts
Name: MrsERod™®
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
wow!! that's so sad!!!
and what i want to know, is how the buyer can sleep at night!!!!
the "broker" aka CROOK, is another story, he just has no heart!!!
Message edited 4/28/2006 8:22:57 AM.
|
Posted 4/28/06 8:18 AM |
|
|
LuckySV
LIF Adult
Member since 10/05 4675 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
That's horrible. So sad.
|
Posted 4/28/06 8:21 AM |
|
|
capricorn75
J-E-T-S
Member since 5/05 1645 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
I just read that. What a sad story.
|
Posted 4/28/06 8:41 AM |
|
|
BabyAvocado
Happy New Year
Member since 5/05 17334 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
Posted by MrsERod
wow!! that's so sad!!!
and what i want to know, is how the buyer can sleep at night!!!!
Exactly! What a cold-hearted beyotch. She's not even buying it as a home, she's buying it to turn a profit.
|
Posted 4/28/06 8:57 AM |
|
|
MRSE
LIF Adult
Member since 5/05 1420 total posts
Name: (112903)
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
I think it is horrible... these people have lived there forever........ they need to get their house back..... I think it is bs that the house was put up for auction
|
Posted 4/28/06 9:52 AM |
|
|
suvenR
designer mutt
Member since 5/05 4239 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
okay, I know I am setting myself up for some punishment, but here goes:
These people couldn't pay their bills. They were already in foreclosure. They should have taken steps to rectify this problem before the foreclosure process began.
Next, they should have done some research on the broker (the crook) whom they were dealing with.
Next, THEIR lawyer didn't do what was necessary to halt the auction. Again, another bad decision made by someone whom THEY choose to represent them.
And, finally, even if the house was given back to them- it still doesn't sound like they'll be able to afford to keep it.
I know, I know. I'm being mean. But, I don't fault the buyer. Sorry Charlie!
|
Posted 4/28/06 10:13 AM |
|
|
Stacey1403
Where it all began....
Member since 5/05 24065 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
Posted by suvenR
okay, I know I am setting myself up for some punishment, but here goes:
These people couldn't pay their bills. They were already in foreclosure. They should have taken steps to rectify this problem before the foreclosure process began.
Next, they should have done some research on the broker (the crook) whom they were dealing with.
Next, THEIR lawyer didn't do what was necessary to halt the auction. Again, another bad decision made by someone whom THEY choose to represent them.
And, finally, even if the house was given back to them- it still doesn't sound like they'll be able to afford to keep it.
I know, I know. I'm being mean. But, I don't fault the buyer. Sorry Charlie!
As much as it stinks I agree with you.
|
Posted 4/28/06 11:20 AM |
|
|
Ambersmom
Straight up nasty
Member since 5/05 7740 total posts
Name: Sharon
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
Posted by Stacey1403
Posted by suvenR
okay, I know I am setting myself up for some punishment, but here goes:
These people couldn't pay their bills. They were already in foreclosure. They should have taken steps to rectify this problem before the foreclosure process began.
Next, they should have done some research on the broker (the crook) whom they were dealing with.
Next, THEIR lawyer didn't do what was necessary to halt the auction. Again, another bad decision made by someone whom THEY choose to represent them.
And, finally, even if the house was given back to them- it still doesn't sound like they'll be able to afford to keep it.
I know, I know. I'm being mean. But, I don't fault the buyer. Sorry Charlie!
As much as it stinks I agree with you.
I do too. They didn't have the funds to keep the house. Still don't. Sad, yes. Unfair, yes.
|
Posted 4/28/06 11:24 AM |
|
|
Beth
The Key to your new home....
Member since 2/06 24849 total posts
Name: Beth
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
it's a sad story- but I have to agree that they were already in forecloser and there is not much that can be done
they still got ripped off- but should have spoken to more then one person- esp someone who solicated them thru the mail
|
Posted 4/28/06 11:25 AM |
|
|
baghag
:P
Member since 5/05 10278 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Anyone read the, "Lifelong house no longer home" article in Newsday?
Posted by Ambersmom
Posted by Stacey1403
Posted by suvenR
okay, I know I am setting myself up for some punishment, but here goes:
These people couldn't pay their bills. They were already in foreclosure. They should have taken steps to rectify this problem before the foreclosure process began.
Next, they should have done some research on the broker (the crook) whom they were dealing with.
Next, THEIR lawyer didn't do what was necessary to halt the auction. Again, another bad decision made by someone whom THEY choose to represent them.
And, finally, even if the house was given back to them- it still doesn't sound like they'll be able to afford to keep it.
I know, I know. I'm being mean. But, I don't fault the buyer. Sorry Charlie!
As much as it stinks I agree with you.
I do too. They didn't have the funds to keep the house. Still don't. Sad, yes. Unfair, yes.
Agreed.
|
Posted 4/28/06 11:26 AM |
|
|