|
Sheer Cover vs. Bare Minerals
| Posted By |
Message |
My3Shmoos
Me and my Monkey
Member since 7/06 2437 total posts
Name:
K
|
Sheer Cover vs. Bare Minerals
Pros and Cons of each?? Any difference??? I don't know what to buy. I do have sensitive skin if that helps with a choice. TIA!!
|
Posted 3/29/08 8:42 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
LemonHead
Sour Girl
Member since 3/08 5271 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Sheer Cover vs. Bare Minerals
I've got really sensitive (blotchy) skin and use Pur Minerals from Ulta. I'm happy with it so far.
|
| Posted 3/30/08 3:22 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: Sheer Cover vs. Bare Minerals
Honestly, neither.
Laura Mercier Mineral Makeup is awesome. The finish is gorgeous and it doesn't irritate my sensitive skin.
|
| Posted 3/30/08 4:58 PM |
| |
|
KartveliT
...
Member since 1/08 8363 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Sheer Cover vs. Bare Minerals
I have both and I don't like sheer cover very much, I mean it's not bad , but B M is much better, feels better on my skin and looks better, so I would say get B M , a friend of mine who first recommended B M has very sensitive skin and that's why she loves it so much.
OH and the B M brushes are GREAT , S C brushes not good at all and they fall apart .
Message edited 3/31/2008 11:56:57 AM.
|
| Posted 3/31/08 11:54 AM |
| |
|
Potentially Related Topics:
Currently 642193 users on the LIFamilies.com Chat
|
