| Posted By |
Message |
2BEANS
wow time is going fast.
Member since 9/07 16106 total posts
Name:
Tina
|
Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
I jut ordered this Kushies Zolo Fuzzi Hugbug. Its weird looking lol.. but was rated top toy for childrens sensory... Must be very popular it was sold out on alot of websites that I went too.
ETA: http://www.kushiesonline.com/Fuzzi-Hugbug-Sensory-Pleasing-Toy-p/80030.htm for those interested Image Attachment(s):
Message edited 11/10/2007 11:52:34 AM.
|
Posted 11/10/07 11:50 AM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
dawnygirl25
Growing up soo fast..
Member since 1/06 14917 total posts
Name:
Dawn
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
strange looking thing now isnt it?
|
| Posted 11/10/07 11:59 AM |
| |
|
KateDevine
*
Member since 6/06 24950 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
Posted by dawnygirl25
strange looking thing now isnt it?
Yeah, WTH is it?
|
| Posted 11/10/07 12:01 PM |
| |
|
2BEANS
wow time is going fast.
Member since 9/07 16106 total posts
Name:
Tina
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
I got it in the mail today.. Wow its actually pretty big. Its head is a squeeckie thing and body sounds like a bell, and feet sounds like a rattles. Colors same as picture.. Hopefully my dd likes it.. gift from santa.
|
| Posted 11/14/07 3:31 PM |
| |
|
Elizabeth
Mom of Three
Member since 9/05 7900 total posts
Name:
"MOMMY!!!"
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
I guess that's the new Whoozit. These were all the rage in 2002 when my DS #1 was born.
|
| Posted 11/14/07 3:38 PM |
| |
|
2BEANS
wow time is going fast.
Member since 9/07 16106 total posts
Name:
Tina
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
Posted by Elizabeth
I guess that's the new Whoozit. These were all the rage in 2002 when my DS #1 was born.
IMAGE
did you get it for your DS and if you did, did he like it? I find when you hear TOP toy it turns out that its not that great.
|
| Posted 11/14/07 3:40 PM |
| |
|
-Lisa-
---------------
Member since 5/05 6530 total posts
Name:
Lisa
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
Posted by Elizabeth
I guess that's the new Whoozit. These were all the rage in 2002 when my DS #1 was born.
Ella LOVED her whoozit (in 2006)!
|
| Posted 11/14/07 3:43 PM |
| |
|
PrincessP
Big sister!!!!!!!!!!
Member since 12/05 17450 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
WOW! what is that...
|
| Posted 11/14/07 3:52 PM |
| |
|
2BEANS
wow time is going fast.
Member since 9/07 16106 total posts
Name:
Tina
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
Posted by PrincessP
WOW! what is that...
LOL no clue.. i thought maybe when i got it, it would say or i would think it was something, but NOPE still have no clue. Maybe thats what we look like to a baby lol
|
| Posted 11/14/07 3:54 PM |
| |
|
DUCKS2001
Then there was 2
Member since 3/06 5696 total posts
Name:
Christine
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
Posted by BabySammie
Posted by Elizabeth
I guess that's the new Whoozit. These were all the rage in 2002 when my DS #1 was born.
IMAGE
did you get it for your DS and if you did, did he like it? I find when you hear TOP toy it turns out that its not that great.
I plan on getting the woozit for DD from Santa. I think she will really like it
|
| Posted 11/14/07 9:30 PM |
| |
|
waytogo
Balancing act on a highwire
Member since 5/05 1292 total posts
Name:
a
|
Re: Was rated top toy for 2007 for ages newborns-18 months.
Don't these remind you of the cabbage patch rage? how bizarre looking...
|
| Posted 11/14/07 9:54 PM |
| |
|
