Only logged in users may view topics in this forum.
Posted By |
Message |
Shelly
She's 7!!!
Member since 8/05 14624 total posts
Name:
|
When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
this column. It has nothing to do with the arrest of her suspected killer, but I thought it was interesting. I hate to post and run but here goes...
Jon Benet Ramsey in Daisy Dukes
In the nearly ten years since Jon Benet Ramsey’s death, I’ve spent little time pondering the identity of that little girl’s murderer. I’ve known the answer to that question for years. And so have you. But one time several years ago - during the height of the media coverage of the case - I did hear one interesting assertion about the parents of Jon Benet Ramsey; namely, that there was absolutely no evidence they had ever sexually abused their little girl.
When I heard the assertion that there was “absolutely no evidence” of sexual abuse of Jon Benet Ramsey, I immediately recalled a picture of the little girl when she was around the age of four. She was wearing a brightly colored strapless dress that matched her brightly colored lipstick. Her makeup was as heavy as that of any hooker or drag queen in San Francisco.
This begs a fundamental question: Are we sexually abusing our little girls when we dress them up to look like prostitutes? Of course, I would submit that we are.
Fortunately, when the Ramsey case broke it was very unusual to see a couple dressing a small child like a hooker. Unfortunately, today it is commonplace. An episode I witnessed the other day illustrates just how little parents seem to think before allowing their little girls to dress and carry themselves in an entirely-too-adult fashion.
On my daily jog though my neighborhood I ran by the house of a man I know fairly well. His garage door was open and music was blaring out of a jam box inside - in fact, the music was so loud it was barely recognizable. But I could tell the song was “These boots are made for walking,” which was popularized by Nancy Sinatra in the 1960s. His two grandchildren were dancing in the driveway to the recent remake of the tune, sung by Jessica Simpson.
As my neighbor’s two grandchildren were standing in the driveway - while gyrating their hips like a couple of prostitutes - I noticed they were both wearing cutoff “Daisy Duke” style short and halter tops. The oldest girl looked like she was wearing mascara. She is 11 years old, by the way. Her younger sister is nine.
There is obviously something very wrong psychologically with the parent who actually dresses a four year old girl like a prostitute. There is also something wrong with the parent who allows a nine or even an eleven year old girl to dress herself like one – not to mention carry herself like one, too. It is not cute. It is simply crude and indecent.
But there is more to the equation than bad taste, here. In today’s world, people who do not make sure their little girls are dressed like little girls are exposing them to extreme danger.
Shortly after I finished my afternoon jog, I went to one of the numerous websites (http://www.mapsexoffenders.com/) that can be used to locate registered sex offenders. I wanted to know how far those two little girls – the ones dancing like hookers - were from the nearest convicted pedophile. The answer: about 500 yards. Parents of small children (especially little girls) need to do the following things after finishing this short but important column:
Log on to the internet and find the nearest registered sex offenders in your neighborhood.
Make sure you voice your complaints to local retailers who sell sexually provocative clothes marketed for little girls.
Make a note of the names of the companies that manufacture inappropriate clothing for children next time you see these products. Write them and tell them exactly why you will never, ever buy their products.
Tune in occasionally to The O’Reilly Factor to keep track of Bill’s segments on Jessica’s law – a measure designed to impose mandatory 25-year sentences on first-time child molesters.
Make sure that your lawmakers know you will not support them unless they support Jessica’s Law. In other words, impose a simple ideological litmus test on all of your representatives.
I hope all of my readers will give serious consideration to the advice I have proffered today. Even if you reject some of my specific points, keep my general thesis in mind. Our little girls will be women far sooner than we would like. For the time being we should just let them be little girls.
Source
Message edited 8/16/2006 4:43:50 PM.
|
Posted 8/16/06 4:42 PM |
|
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
VirginiaDeb
Don't eat me, hippo!
Member since 5/05 9252 total posts
Name: Deb
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Wow! Great article!
Was it on here, or on another board that I saw something about a 6 year old being sent home for having her thong show at school...
It just ain't right.
|
Posted 8/16/06 4:50 PM |
|
|
Eva Luna
Be kind...life's hard!
Member since 8/05 4750 total posts
Name: God, bless & heal my DH, JenG's DH Rob & DebG
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
The article, while true on many points, completely turned me off. Her use of the words "prostitute (s)" and "hooker (s)" was extremely excessive and IMO not necessary to make her point.
|
Posted 8/16/06 4:56 PM |
|
|
metsgirlie
How did you get blue eyes?
Member since 11/05 3763 total posts
Name: LC's Mommy
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by VirginiaDeb
Wow! Great article!
Was it on here, or on another board that I saw something about a 6 year old being sent home for having her thong show at school...
It just ain't right.
A 6 yr old in a thong? That is crazy.
|
Posted 8/16/06 4:58 PM |
|
|
MrsMerlot
Unconditional Love
Member since 4/06 6005 total posts
Name: Chrissy
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by sasha
The article, while true on many points, completely turned me off. Her use of the words "prostitute (s)" and "hooker (s)" was extremely excessive and IMO not necessary to make her point.
I agree completely. The story/opinion had me intrigued for a while and it's a great "spin" but to go as far as using protitute and hooker....
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:01 PM |
|
|
danielleandscott
My new 71 Super Beetle
Member since 5/05 13476 total posts
Name: Scott
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by VirginiaDeb
Wow! Great article!
Was it on here, or on another board that I saw something about a 6 year old being sent home for having her thong show at school...
It just ain't right.
What the he11 is wrong with these parents???!!!
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:03 PM |
|
|
chikita315
Love
Member since 8/06 7945 total posts
Name: M-lo
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by sasha
The article, while true on many points, completely turned me off. Her use of the words "prostitute (s)" and "hooker (s)" was extremely excessive and IMO not necessary to make her point.
It was actually written by a man . . . which I found odd. I felt the tone to be more female.
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:05 PM |
|
|
luvsbob4603
To a healthy 2013
Member since 5/05 21840 total posts
Name: To a brand new year to a healthier me
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
what a great article!
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:06 PM |
|
|
heidla
Me and the guys
Member since 5/05 4024 total posts
Name: Heidi
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by sasha
The article, while true on many points, completely turned me off. Her use of the words "prostitute (s)" and "hooker (s)" was extremely excessive and IMO not necessary to make her point.
I agree. Was this needed I wanted to know how far those two little girls – the ones dancing like hookers - were from the nearest convicted pedophile? Plus, anyone that advises me to watch the O'Riely factor has questionable taste as far as I am concerned.
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:09 PM |
|
|
suvenR
designer mutt
Member since 5/05 4239 total posts
Name:
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
I agree 100% with the article.
IMO, she was right to use the words that she did...she was trying to drive home a point to the people who think it's perfectly okay to dress their little girls this way
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:11 PM |
|
|
Eva Luna
Be kind...life's hard!
Member since 8/05 4750 total posts
Name: God, bless & heal my DH, JenG's DH Rob & DebG
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by chikita315
Posted by sasha
The article, while true on many points, completely turned me off. Her use of the words "prostitute (s)" and "hooker (s)" was extremely excessive and IMO not necessary to make her point.
It was actually written by a man . . . which I found odd. I felt the tone to be more female.
I didn't know that...that may explain the "hooker" and "prostitute" fascination. Maybe a woman would have been less crude.
Posted by heidla
Posted by sasha
The article, while true on many points, completely turned me off. Her use of the words "prostitute (s)" and "hooker (s)" was extremely excessive and IMO not necessary to make her point.
I agree. Was this needed I wanted to know how far those two little girls – the ones dancing like hookers - were from the nearest convicted pedophile? Plus, anyone that advises me to watch the O'Riely factor has questionable taste as far as I am concerned.
Completely agree!! When I read "O'Reilly" I immediately gagged.
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:12 PM |
|
|
heidla
Me and the guys
Member since 5/05 4024 total posts
Name: Heidi
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by suvenR
I agree 100% with the article.
IMO, she was right to use the words that she did...she was trying to drive home a point to the people who think it's perfectly okay to dress their little girls this way
I doubt that the people making such chocies are reading his column.
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:15 PM |
|
|
Eva Luna
Be kind...life's hard!
Member since 8/05 4750 total posts
Name: God, bless & heal my DH, JenG's DH Rob & DebG
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by suvenR
I agree 100% with the article.
IMO, she was right to use the words that she did...she was trying to drive home a point to the people who think it's perfectly okay to dress their little girls this way
It's a man and I don't think it was necessary to write "hooker" 3 times and "prostitute" 3 times. Excessive IMO.
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:15 PM |
|
|
MrsERod
Praying for Everyone.
Member since 5/05 26170 total posts
Name: MrsERod™®
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
i think it was a great article...
and while the use of certain terminology may seem crude to some readers, i think the author intentionally used them to make an impact - and he obviously succeeded in doing so.
Message edited 8/16/2006 5:21:31 PM.
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:18 PM |
|
|
dandr10199
Grace is growing up too fast!
Member since 10/05 11561 total posts
Name: Dina
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by MrsERod
i think it was a great article...
and while the use of certain terminology may seem crude to some readers, i think the author intentionally used them to make an impact - and he obviously succeeded in doing so.
i agree.
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:28 PM |
|
|
suvenR
designer mutt
Member since 5/05 4239 total posts
Name:
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by sasha
Posted by suvenR
I agree 100% with the article.
IMO, she was right to use the words that she did...she was trying to drive home a point to the people who think it's perfectly okay to dress their little girls this way
It's a man and I don't think it was necessary to write "hooker" 3 times and "prostitute" 3 times. Excessive IMO.
I was surprised to read that a male wrote it. But, regardless, I agree with his use of "hooker" and "prostitute"
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:30 PM |
|
|
Eva Luna
Be kind...life's hard!
Member since 8/05 4750 total posts
Name: God, bless & heal my DH, JenG's DH Rob & DebG
|
Re: When searching for info on JonBenet Ramsey I found...
Posted by MrsERod
i think it was a great article...
and while the use of certain terminology may seem crude to some readers, i think the author intentionally used them to make an impact - and he obviously succeeded in doing so.
The article was good, his writing style not so much.
We'll definitely agree to disagree on this one lady!
|
Posted 8/16/06 5:31 PM |
|
|