Posted By |
Message |
Pages: [1] 2 |
Laura1976
Member since 5/05 5754 total posts
Name: Laura
|
New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
don't know how true this is, but it does make sense. got it from someone who knows someone who is a top ET or entertainment weekly person (or one of those shows/mags)
suri is actually 2 months older then they are saying, and that katie gave birth at home in ohio. They had to wait to show pics until they could pass her off as a 4 month old, since she's really 6 months old. don't know how true it is, but i'm just passing the info along
***EMAIL i just got : The story goes that when Katie Holmes split with her exboyfriend Chris Klein in March 2005, she may or may not have realized she was pregnant with his baby. She started dating Tom in April, 2005, and according to this tale, when Tom found out she was expecting, he not only didn't MIND , but he insisted on taking credit for the pregnancy. They abruptly got engaged in June 2005. Since the baby was scheduled to be born too soon into their relationship, Tom and Katie faked the birth date. She actually gave birth months EARLIER than the announced birth. She wore padding for the last few months after the REAL birth, and made sure she was photographed. In case you don't remember, Suri's announced April 18 birth was oddly undocumented - there were no hospital records or specifics. Where WAS Suri born? Tom and Katie didn't want their baby photographed because it would be apparent that Suri wasn't newborn. After a few months it's not so easy to recognize a baby's exact age. Have you noticed that Suri has uniquely slanted eyes like Chris Klein?
Message edited 9/7/2006 3:57:16 PM.
|
Posted 9/7/06 11:56 AM |
|
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
spooks
So in love!
Member since 6/06 4378 total posts
Name: Sarah
|
Re: New Suri gossip
I'm tempted to believe this - the baby looks older than 4 months to me.
|
Posted 9/7/06 12:14 PM |
|
|
Eva Luna
Be kind...life's hard!
Member since 8/05 4750 total posts
Name: God, bless & heal my DH, JenG's DH Rob & DebG
|
Re: New Suri gossip
This is definitely one thing I have always thought. That baby is much bigger than "normal".
|
Posted 9/7/06 12:19 PM |
|
|
lilqtny
-Crossfit & pitbull addict
Member since 7/06 2830 total posts
Name: Tracy
|
Re: New Suri gossip
I'm not too sure about that....as I have stated in other posts on this topic, I think it is time that everybody just leave them alone already. Suri is a beautiful baby and they seem happy in those pictures.. Yes they are celebrity and they did put it all out there for public view, however now they want privacy for their child. Isn't everybody entitled to give their child the best, most normal life they can regardless of if they are famous or not. I think that it is great that they tried to keep her out of public view for so long. Why does everybody feel that it is their duty to parade her around and show her off??? This child didn't have a choice in being famous or not and it isn't right for the media to trash talk an infant. Things like saying she is "distorted" or "something must be wrong with her" make me want to vomit. She is a child, an INNOCENT baby. If we can't respect Katie and Tom can't we at least respect the baby??? JMHO
|
Posted 9/7/06 1:17 PM |
|
|
Shroggie
Don't Worry...Be Happy
Member since 5/06 6261 total posts
Name:
|
Re: New Suri gossip
I could believe that.
|
Posted 9/7/06 1:19 PM |
|
|
SweetestOfPeas
J'taime Paris!
Member since 3/06 32345 total posts
Name:
|
Re: New Suri gossip
if that's true, kudos to them for pulling it off!
seriously, it must be great to have so much money when you're a celeb, but your whole life is constantly under a microscope I would HATE that!
|
Posted 9/7/06 1:36 PM |
|
|
Snozberry
I might steal your diamonds
Member since 2/06 4680 total posts
Name: Melissa
|
Re: New Suri gossip
I actually don't feel that's any parent's duty, no matter how famous they are.
However, they set themselves up for the speculation in their sudden secrecy.
Posted by Laura1976 suri is actually 2 months older then they are saying, and that katie gave birth at home in ohio. They had to wait to show pics until they could pass her off as a 4 month old, since she's really 6 months old. don't know how true it is, but i'm just passing the info along
I could see this being true.
|
Posted 9/7/06 1:40 PM |
|
|
MikesWife
Wanting...........
Member since 1/06 6887 total posts
Name: Karen
|
Re: New Suri gossip
I think that it is one thing to be open about your own relationship, but maybe you want to keep your child out of the spotlight. I can't fault them for that.
|
Posted 9/7/06 1:42 PM |
|
|
Tannika
LIF Infant
Member since 8/05 203 total posts
Name: Tannika
|
Re: New Suri gossip
I just think we all care way too much.
First we hear the pic is not even Suri, but an imposter baby. Now, Suri's actually older than they're saying.
At this point, I don't care, and all I know is that WHOEVER's baby that is, it is one of the most cute babies I have ever seen, regardless how old she is. She's adorable.
|
Posted 9/7/06 1:59 PM |
|
|
Kirsten
LIF Toddler
Member since 5/05 485 total posts
Name: Kirsten
|
Re: New Suri gossip
I say the baby is 6 months old but katie didn't give birth to her
|
Posted 9/7/06 2:06 PM |
|
|
Stacey1403
Where it all began....
Member since 5/05 24065 total posts
Name:
|
Re: New Suri gossip
I think she looks 4 months. I don't believe that story.
|
Posted 9/7/06 2:09 PM |
|
|
pinkandblue
Our family is complete, maybe
Member since 9/05 32436 total posts
Name: Stephanie
|
Re: New Suri gossip
Posted by lilqtny
I'm not too sure about that....as I have stated in other posts on this topic, I think it is time that everybody just leave them alone already. Suri is a beautiful baby and they seem happy in those pictures.. Yes they are celebrity and they did put it all out there for public view, however now they want privacy for their child. Isn't everybody entitled to give their child the best, most normal life they can regardless of if they are famous or not. I think that it is great that they tried to keep her out of public view for so long. Why does everybody feel that it is their duty to parade her around and show her off??? This child didn't have a choice in being famous or not and it isn't right for the media to trash talk an infant. Things like saying she is "distorted" or "something must be wrong with her" make me want to vomit. She is a child, an INNOCENT baby. If we can't respect Katie and Tom can't we at least respect the baby??? JMHO
I totally agree, some people are just downright mean
|
Posted 9/7/06 2:25 PM |
|
|
joenick
Us
Member since 6/06 9370 total posts
Name: Valerie...aka...Do Me A Favor?
|
Re: New Suri gossip
WHatever. She's a cute kid nonetheless. I'm tired of these people (Tom/Katie) already. They've worn out their shock value.
|
Posted 9/7/06 3:19 PM |
|
|
|
Re: New Suri gossip
Could be. She is an adorable baby and her eyes and mouth are SO much like Katies. I hope Tom and Katie can put some of their weirdness behind them and be good parents, thats what counts.
|
Posted 9/7/06 3:23 PM |
|
|
MsMBV
:P
Member since 5/05 28602 total posts
Name: Me
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
Posted by Laura1976
***EMAIL i just got : The story goes that when Katie Holmes split with her exboyfriend Chris Klein in March 2005, she may or may not have realized she was pregnant with his baby. She started dating Tom in April, 2005, and according to this tale, when Tom found out she was expecting, he not only didn't MIND , but he insisted on taking credit for the pregnancy. They abruptly got engaged in June 2005. Since the baby was scheduled to be born too soon into their relationship, Tom and Katie faked the birth date. She actually gave birth months EARLIER than the announced birth. She wore padding for the last few months after the REAL birth, and made sure she was photographed. In case you don't remember, Suri's announced April 18 birth was oddly undocumented - there were no hospital records or specifics. Where WAS Suri born? Tom and Katie didn't want their baby photographed because it would be apparent that Suri wasn't newborn. After a few months it's not so easy to recognize a baby's exact age. Have you noticed that Suri has uniquely slanted eyes like Chris Klein?
We were discussing this at lunch & I do believe that this could be the case. I do believe that she was pregnant at one point, as she seems to have stretch marks & now looks a little "jowl-y" but she did not look pregnant when she was supposed to be in the final weeks of her PG /Suri.
Message edited 9/7/2006 4:42:01 PM.
|
Posted 9/7/06 4:40 PM |
|
|
Tany
Becoming a different woman
Member since 5/05 24460 total posts
Name: Tania
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
I do believe that's her baby but not Tom's.
|
Posted 9/7/06 4:44 PM |
|
|
Emily
Kasey & Me! Lurves it!
Member since 7/06 8703 total posts
Name: STBHC
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
omg i was thinking it looked like Chris Klein!!!
|
Posted 9/7/06 5:06 PM |
|
|
MelToddJulia
Love my Family!
Member since 7/05 29064 total posts
Name: Mel
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
I guess we will never now the truth, nor do I care, its there kid. JMO
|
Posted 9/7/06 5:32 PM |
|
|
june262004
But I love the Snow!
Member since 5/05 15379 total posts
Name: Kristin
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
I think suri looks like chris klein. Im STILL trying to figure out how Tom got her pregnant since he couldn't have children with Nicole (and it was him not her)
|
Posted 9/8/06 9:56 AM |
|
|
MrsRbk
<3 <3 <3 <3
Member since 1/06 19197 total posts
Name: Michelle
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
I was the biggest skeptic out there, but I happen to think Suri looks alot like Tom
|
Posted 9/8/06 10:58 AM |
|
|
Shanti
True love
Member since 6/05 12653 total posts
Name:
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
Posted by lilqtny
I'm not too sure about that....as I have stated in other posts on this topic, I think it is time that everybody just leave them alone already. Suri is a beautiful baby and they seem happy in those pictures.. Yes they are celebrity and they did put it all out there for public view, however now they want privacy for their child. Isn't everybody entitled to give their child the best, most normal life they can regardless of if they are famous or not. I think that it is great that they tried to keep her out of public view for so long. Why does everybody feel that it is their duty to parade her around and show her off??? This child didn't have a choice in being famous or not and it isn't right for the media to trash talk an infant. Things like saying she is "distorted" or "something must be wrong with her" make me want to vomit. She is a child, an INNOCENT baby. If we can't respect Katie and Tom can't we at least respect the baby??? JMHO
I totally agree with this. I never got why ppl were so obsessed with seeing a pic. Maybe they just wanted privacy for themselves in the early stages of her life. Whatever the story, Suri is an innocent baby -- everyone should respect her right to a happy childhood.
|
Posted 9/10/06 6:52 AM |
|
|
dooodles
When you wish upon a star
Member since 5/05 11997 total posts
Name: Because 2 people fell in love
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
Even if this idea is right, why wouldn't they just release a picture of her when she was newborn? Who would have known it was taken 2 months previous to when it was released?
|
Posted 9/10/06 8:49 AM |
|
|
beautyq115
New Year!
Member since 5/05 13729 total posts
Name: Me
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
I can believe this
|
Posted 9/10/06 9:02 PM |
|
|
HarleyGirlFLA
Come on in
Member since 5/05 9674 total posts
Name: Mel
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
I guess this will be one of E!'s true hollywood best kept secrets
They'll be in the spotlight until another odd celebrity couple does something. The media has too much time on their hands
|
Posted 9/10/06 9:52 PM |
|
|
MarisaK
HELLO Manolo !!
Member since 5/06 14562 total posts
Name: Marisa
|
Re: New Suri gossip - EDITED with kind of funnty new info
I would believe it - Didn't anyone find it odd that BOTH of his ex wives "couldn't" get prego, but he's dating this one for like 5 minutes and BAM ......there's a baby ???
|
Posted 9/10/06 10:20 PM |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 |