| Posted By |
Message |
Stefanie
♥
Member since 5/05 23599 total posts
Name:
Stefanie
|
Ok, um...so what was the big deal
about Britney's performance?
I thought she $ucked IMHO...
|
Posted 9/9/07 11:23 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
Tany
Becoming a different woman
Member since 5/05 24460 total posts
Name:
Tania
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
it wasn't, she s ucked so badly.
|
| Posted 9/9/07 11:26 PM |
| |
|
mbawnr
LIF Toddler
Member since 6/07 400 total posts
Name:
Vanessa
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
bad bad bad
|
| Posted 9/10/07 6:29 AM |
| |
|
raken40
soooo in love:)
Member since 5/05 4369 total posts
Name:
Karen
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
does this girl ever sing live??
|
| Posted 9/10/07 6:48 AM |
| |
|
Lanabean
Yoginis
Member since 11/05 9202 total posts
Name:
Lana
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
No energy, vacant in the eyes, and not even her usual sexy dancing. The body looked nice, but otherwise....it's over for her and i think everyone knew it. And Sarah Silverman was so trashy to call her kids "mistakes." I mean, grow the eff up.
|
| Posted 9/10/07 7:30 AM |
| |
|
eroxgirl
My Loves
Member since 5/05 15697 total posts
Name:
Rebecca
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
She was HORRIBLE! She had no energy, her lip synching wasn't even a little bit convincing (I'm one of those people who can never tell if someone is lip synching) and she didn't even dance - she just pranced around the stage in her underwear.
The entire audience looked like this watching her:   
|
| Posted 9/10/07 7:37 AM |
| |
|
JennZ
MY LIFE!!
Member since 8/05 25463 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
She's in idiot. She looked baked out of her mind, unprepaired and off even in her lip sync. HORRID. SHe is officially DONE.
|
| Posted 9/10/07 7:45 AM |
| |
|
curliegirl
He's here!!!!
Member since 3/06 10128 total posts
Name:
Gina
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
Posted by Lanabean
No energy, vacant in the eyes, and not even her usual sexy dancing. The body looked nice, but otherwise....it's over for her and i think everyone knew it. And Sarah Silverman was so trashy to call her kids "mistakes." I mean, grow the eff up.
I agree on all counts Lana.
Britney was awful, she didn't even move, and I wasn't THAT impressed with her figure.
Silverman was awful as well, you could hear the crickets in the background while she was on stage......
|
| Posted 9/10/07 8:18 AM |
| |
|
Shelly
She's 7!!!
Member since 8/05 14624 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
I think the big deal was it was supposed to be her "comeback" performance, and she was awful. Her expressions, her dancing, her lip syncing. Even her body- although it looked great for a mom of 2 (hey I would be very happy to look like that), for a pop star wearing only a bra and panties, its not up to par with the other pop stars.
|
| Posted 9/10/07 8:50 AM |
| |
|
4ForMe
:)
Member since 11/05 5666 total posts
Name:
Barbara
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
Posted by Shelly
Even her body- although it looked great for a mom of 2 (hey I would be very happy to look like that), for a pop star wearing only a bra and panties, its not up to par with the other pop stars.
I agree! I would not say she is fat, but maybe a little "thick" for an outfit like that.
|
| Posted 9/10/07 9:29 AM |
| |
|
MichelleR
my Becks
Member since 5/05 1772 total posts
Name:
tracyg
|
Re: Ok, um...so what was the big deal
Agree with all the above statements, although I tuned out before seeing Sarah Silverman.
She looks like she did her own hair too. There was no emotion or vibrance in her performance. And to even try to lipsynch the "robotic" part of the song??? Who are you fooling? Why even have the headset/mic on? 
|
| Posted 9/10/07 9:45 AM |
| |
|
