LIFamilies.com - Long Island, NY


RSS
Articles Business Directory Blog Real Estate Community Forum Shop My Family Contests

Log In Chat Index Search Rules Lingo Create Account

Quick navigation:   

Random Searches

Posted By Message
Pages: [1] 2

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Random Searches

I don't know if you guys discussed this already but I'd like to hear your thoughts and feelings on this... the random searching of personal bags on subways in NY & NJ.

You have the right to refuse the search but if you refuse you don't get to ride.

Also... what do you think about the probability that these "random" searches won't be so "random" at all - that many police officers will knowingly or unknowingly select people for searches based on racial profiling?

Posted 7/25/05 8:22 AM
 
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

Well at this point i feel it is our police trying anything to prevent a disaster. We have to be proactive some how and if they feel this will be a deterant then search away. My life is more important than someones rights. And like you said if someone doesn't want to be searched then they can refuse.

But i think once school starts up again this will be a lost cause. There will be hoards of kids with backpacks and a terrorist can easily get on without being detected. So unless they plan to check EVERYONE, i think these searches will be ineffective.

As far as the racial profiling is concerned. Well IMO that is a consequence. Will it happen....i am sure. BUT let's face it certain ethnicities are doing this and will obviously be singled out more.

Posted 7/25/05 8:28 AM
 

Shorty
.

Member since 5/05

30390 total posts

Name:
really

Re: Random Searches

I think that at this time, there is a lot of uncertainty about EVERYTHING.

I mean, OK, they're checking bags. How do they know that someone with a "clean" bag doesn't have wires strapped to his chest under his suit?! They have no clue. I feel like this is just another bump in the "false sense of security" road.

Posted 7/25/05 8:29 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Honestly, it seems like pure laziness to me. And I don't agree with our 4th amendment rights being violated because our government is lazy or inexperienced in handling terrorist threats. I say laziness because rather than go out and acquire the intelligence necessary to stop a potential attack, or hunt down the actual terrorist, or coming up with new, innovative ways of preventing or fighting terrorist threats - our gov't chooses to take the easy way out by just searching "random" people. It's like they couldn't come up with anything better. And, I agree in that I think it will ultimately be ineffective at everything besides violating our civil rights and moving towards a less free & democratic society -- exactly what the terrorists wanted - to change our way of life.

Posted 7/25/05 8:35 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

Someone posted the 4th amendment and it didn't look like it was a violation. But i could be wrong

Posted 7/25/05 8:36 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

Posted by BabyAvocado

I say laziness because rather than go out and acquire the intelligence necessary to stop a potential attack, or hunt down the actual terrorist, or coming up with new, innovative ways of preventing or fighting terrorist threats -



I don't think they have figured out how to do that without invading civil rights.
Terrorists are now being born here and trained here. How can we not violate some rights?
I just think we are running out of answers

Message edited 7/25/2005 8:39:40 AM.

Posted 7/25/05 8:38 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Redhead

Someone posted the 4th amendment and it didn't look like it was a violation. But i could be wrong



I could be wrong but doesn't the Fourth Amendment protect us from "unreasonable search & seizure"... let me go double check...

Posted 7/25/05 8:38 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

When someone gets on to a airplane they randomly search...Same with cruise ships....Nobody is upset about that

Posted 7/25/05 8:39 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Found this on findlaw.com:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

There's more to it of course, and exceptions but I don't think these searches fall under those exceptions... well - I suppose that is what they will battle in court.

Posted 7/25/05 8:42 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

Posted by BabyAvocado

Found this on findlaw.com:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

There's more to it of course, and exceptions but I don't think these searches fall under those exceptions... well - I suppose that is what they will battle in court.


But like i said...people are already being searched to get on planes and boats....

I don't like it but if it saves anyone life well i guess i will tolerate it. And also you do have the right to refuse!

ETA. I guess peoples definition of unreasonable is different

Message edited 7/25/2005 8:44:39 AM.

Posted 7/25/05 8:43 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Redhead

I just think we are running out of answers




I totally agree with this. I think this is the reasoning behind the searches but it's just not a good enough answer for me. Not a good enough reason to violate our rights on daily basis.

Posted 7/25/05 8:44 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

Posted by BabyAvocado

Posted by Redhead

I just think we are running out of answers




I totally agree with this. I think this is the reasoning behind the searches but it's just not a good enough answer for me. Not a good enough reason to violate our rights on daily basis.


true...i wish there were better ways because this is REALLY DESPERATE! And that scares me even more! That the people who are in charge of our safety are grasping at straws now .

Message edited 7/25/2005 8:46:27 AM.

Posted 7/25/05 8:46 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Redhead

But like i said...people are already being searched to get on planes and boats....

I don't like it but if it saves anyone life well i guess i will tolerate it. And also you do have the right to refuse!

ETA. I guess peoples definition of unreasonable is different



Boats and planes I can understand a little better because you are dealing with international destinations. There has always been stricter security (as there should be) at our ports of entry.

I guess I just have a bigger problem with people's everyday lives being invaded. And yes, I do find the searches unreasonable IMO because I also feel they will probably be ineffective at stopping or deterring terrorist threats. Yet, police are able to use anything they find in their searches (unrelated to terrorism) against you.

Posted 7/25/05 8:48 AM
 

Tah-wee-ZAH
Kisses

Member since 5/05

15952 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Speaking from the perspective of being in London during the first round of attacks I can tell you that their security is better than ours and it still happened. That being said, that doesn't mean we shouldn't do more.

I am a huge advocate of CCTV... that is why they were able to move on this case so quickly. Unfortunately, in our country the ACLU will freak out about the use of such cameras and long court cases will be fought at tax-payers money that can be used for security. Well, they are not being put in the bathrooms or bedrooms but on the street and in other public places. If we are all behaving and are doing what we are suppose to be doing, when and where we are supposed to be doing it then what is the problem? The thousands of cameras in the London Underground and on the streets, along with thousands of hours of videotape was the key element in the police closing in the the identity of the attackers and their families. Oh, and the fact that one of their mother's called them in as missingChat Icon

While searches are by no means a 100% fool-proof method that doesn't mean we shouldn't do them. Every little bit helps. I do think that it is the PUBLIC'S VIGILANCE that is key. We should always report IMMEDIATELY an unattended bag. I do think it is foolish that the police are announcing how, when and who (every 5th person, etc.) will be searched. They should be random and spontaneous.

As for the profiling... this is a tough one. I know many of you might disagree with what I'm saying but hear me out here please. If it was any other crime... for example, if a series of rapes occured in an area and the discription was a white, thirty-something, 250 lbs. man with blonde hair would the police be stopping women, children, and men who don't fit that description... I don't think so.

The men who perpetrated these heinous acts in London did so not just because they disagree with Blair's policies. It's really because they are disenfranchised in British society. Muslim men have a much higher rate of unemployment in Britain than the general population and that is what is feeding their rage.

I am a firm believer in individual rights and the promotion of a democratic and free society but sometimes the rights of "the greater good" do take precedent. I do believe that random searches do fall into this category and yes, they should be done. We just all have to leave the house a little earlier.

They have helped to decrease bus bombings in Isreal.

Posted 7/25/05 8:49 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Redhead

Posted by BabyAvocado

Posted by Redhead

I just think we are running out of answers




I totally agree with this. I think this is the reasoning behind the searches but it's just not a good enough answer for me. Not a good enough reason to violate our rights on daily basis.


true...i wish there were better ways because this is REALLY DESPERATE! And that scares me even more! That the people who are in charge of our safety are grasping at straws now .



EXACTLY!!! It really IS scary!

Posted 7/25/05 8:49 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

Posted by BabyAvocado

Boats and planes I can understand a little better because you are dealing with international destinations. There has always been stricter security (as there should be) at our ports of entry.




Now they search domestic flights as well, i am assuming because the terrorists weren't on international flights!

Posted 7/25/05 8:50 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Redhead

Posted by BabyAvocado

Boats and planes I can understand a little better because you are dealing with international destinations. There has always been stricter security (as there should be) at our ports of entry.




Now they search domestic flights as well, i am assuming because the terrorists weren't on international flights!



That's right...as well they should because they are in close proximity to the international flights... but notice how security at smaller airports that are not international is not nearly as strict or thorough.

Posted 7/25/05 8:55 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

I guess ultimately i may not like it but i have family that travel in the city. And if a subway, train or bus was blown up and they were killed. That would be more devestating to me then a bag search.

Posted 7/25/05 8:57 AM
 

Tah-wee-ZAH
Kisses

Member since 5/05

15952 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Ladies,

Keep in mind that these most recent attacks were made by people who lived in the country and were citizens of the country. They did not enter the country to carry out these attacks, nor, did they bring these explosives in. They grew up in Leeds, they were not flying in from Pakistan so they would not have been caught by security at an airport or a dock.

Terrorists will always exploit the weakest link in our security. It is highly unlikely that al-Quaida or their subsidiaries will use air transport again as they know that is being monitored. They also want to create as much terror as possible so they must hit at our daily lives... what better than buses, railways, bridges and tunnels.

I also think it's VERY irresponsible of our media to always report on how particular aspects of our infrastructure are less ecure than they should be... bridges, nuclear power plants. They should just send the videotape to all on the suspected terrorist watchlist.

Yes, the 4th ammenment does protect individual rights, however, it depends upon the curcumstances. For example, in cases when one's rights as an individual to speak or act may inflect harm to another, then it is limited. Famous example, yelling fire in a crowded theater, slander and libel cases, etc.

Posted 7/25/05 8:58 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Tah-wee-ZAH

Ladies,

Keep in mind that these most recent attacks were made by people who lived in the country and were citizens of the country. They did not enter the country to carry out these attacks, nor, did they bring these explosives in. They grew up in Leeds, they were not flying in from Pakistan so they would not have been caught by security at an airport or a dock.



actually i pointed that out above Chat Icon

Posted 7/25/05 9:02 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Redhead

I guess ultimately i may not like it but i have family that travel in the city. And if a subway, train or bus was blown up and they were killed. That would be more devestating to me then a bag search.



I guess then the question is, well at what point is it too much? Because we could also put NY in a state of martial law and that also may or may not help weed out the terrorists or prevent an attack but in the meantime we couldn't go about our normal lives...


Posted 7/25/05 9:02 AM
 

Redhead
You Live, You Learn

Member since 5/05

31871 total posts

Name:
Jennifer

Re: Random Searches

Posted by BabyAvocado

Posted by Redhead

I guess ultimately i may not like it but i have family that travel in the city. And if a subway, train or bus was blown up and they were killed. That would be more devestating to me then a bag search.



I guess then the question is, well at what point is it too much? Because we could also put NY in a state of martial law and that also may or may not help weed out the terrorists or prevent an attack but in the meantime we couldn't go about our normal lives...




true...and i am not sure where that line should be drawn. All i know is that i fear. Yes this is ultimately what they want. But i am scared. Chat Icon

Posted 7/25/05 9:04 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Tah-wee-ZAH

Ladies,

Keep in mind that these most recent attacks were made by people who lived in the country and were citizens of the country. They did not enter the country to carry out these attacks, nor, did they bring these explosives in. They grew up in Leeds, they were not flying in from Pakistan so they would not have been caught by security at an airport or a dock.

Terrorists will always exploit the weakest link in our security. It is highly unlikely that al-Quaida or their subsidiaries will use air transport again as they know that is being monitored. They also want to create as much terror as possible so they must hit at our daily lives... what better than buses, railways, bridges and tunnels.

I also think it's VERY irresponsible of our media to always report on how particular aspects of our infrastructure are less ecure than they should be... bridges, nuclear power plants. They should just send the videotape to all on the suspected terrorist watchlist.

Yes, the 4th ammenment does protect individual rights, however, it depends upon the curcumstances. For example, in cases when one's rights as an individual to speak or act may inflect harm to another, then it is limited. Famous example, yelling fire in a crowded theater, slander and libel cases, etc.




I know that likelihood that our next would-be attackers are living among us is very high - but the question still is - is this the best way to go about this? The idea that 'every little bit helps' could just inch us closer and closer to much less free society that still has not learned properly dealt with terrorism.

I agree that it is very irresponsible of our media to exploit weaknesses, although I do think that sometimes it actually helps by drawing attention to a weak spot - it decreases the probability that a terrorist would attack there next.

And yes the 4th amendment does have its exceptions, as I said. And whether or not these searches fall into those exceptions (consent searches, border searches, etc) is probably what will be debated when this goes to court.

Posted 7/25/05 9:21 AM
 

BabyAvocado
Happy New Year

Member since 5/05

17334 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

Posted by Redhead

true...and i am not sure where that line should be drawn. All i know is that i fear. Yes this is ultimately what they want. But i am scared. Chat Icon



I know - it s-cks. Chat Icon

Posted 7/25/05 9:22 AM
 

ggt08
;)

Member since 5/05

5208 total posts

Name:

Re: Random Searches

If I am asked to have my bag searched, I am going to do it, regardless of my privacy..

My bag was randomly searched on a trips last year. I didnt know until I got home and there was a note in my bag saying it was searched...

Do I think it is going to truly prevent anything- no.. I think we are living in desperate and scary times but I will do whatever they ask me...

We live in a scary world today....

Posted 7/25/05 3:00 PM
 
Pages: [1] 2
 

Potentially Related Topics:

Topic Posted By Started Replies Forum
When random people come knocking on the door asking for money... june262004 3/4/06 30 Families Helping Families ™
This is so random, but does anyone else take Flaxseed oil? Lanabean 3/1/06 15 Families Helping Families ™
random blackheads Michi 2/26/06 5 Families Helping Families ™
Random budgeting poll itsbabytime 2/13/06 20 Families Helping Families ™
Random - does anyone eat parmingana cheese or romano cheese straight out of the container MrsPorkChop 2/9/06 25 Families Helping Families ™
Random Poll because I'm so bored sunnyplus3 1/29/06 18 Home
 
Quick navigation:   
Currently 586519 users on the LIFamilies.com Chat
New Businesses
1 More Rep
Carleton Hall of East Islip
J&A Building Services
LaraMae Health Coaching
Sonic Wellness
Julbaby Photography LLC
Ideal Uniforms
Teresa Geraghty Photography
Camelot Dream Homes
Long Island Wedding Boutique
MB Febus- Rodan & Fields
Camp Harbor
Market America-Shop.com
ACM Basement Waterproofing
Travel Tom

      Follow LIWeddings on Facebook

      Follow LIFamilies on Twitter
Long Island Bridal Shows