Posted By |
Message |
|
Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
Haul out the biscuits and gravy, crispy duck, Snickers, milk shakes, pizza and butter-soaked potatoes – Renée Zellweger's very special diet to get in shape to play Bridget Jones, because the Oscar winner is prepping to play the full-figured singleton once again.
Zellweger, 40, is expected to start filming at the end of this year what will be the third installment about the love-starved British publishing executive, Variety reports.
This time, the story will likely focus on 40-ish Bridget's desire to have a baby before time runs out, as based on author Helen Fielding's weekly newspaper columns for Britain's the Independent, says the showbiz trade publication.
The Oscar winner for Cold Mountain, who was nominated for 2001's Bridget Jones's Diary and also starred in the 2004 sequel, Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason, recently spelled out what she desires in a man, saying: I'm looking for an encyclopedia and a dictionary. A bit of the Boy Scouts Handbook. A person who is conscientious about the trail he leaves behind him. Love. Unconditional kindness."
|
Posted 7/15/09 8:23 AM |
|
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
smdl
I love Gary too..on a plate!
Member since 5/06 32461 total posts
Name: me
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
She was 135 Lbs when she made the movies. BY FAR, less than most women in the US. So in essence the movie is saying that most women are HUGE and FAT.
|
Posted 7/15/09 8:41 AM |
|
|
CrankyPants
I'm cranky
Member since 7/06 18178 total posts
Name: Mama Cranky
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
I am excited there will be a third movie-I love them.
However, there wasn't a third book, was there?
As for the "full figured" comments-that has been going on since this started. It's annoying to think that someone around 130lbs would be considered full figured, but not enough as to end my love of these movies.
|
Posted 7/15/09 9:35 AM |
|
|
maybebaby
LIF Adult
Member since 11/05 6870 total posts
Name: Maureen
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
She was only in the 130s in those movies?? Maybe she is on the shorter side? I never thought of her as fat but I do know at 140 I looked smaller than her (during that time anyway, lol)...hmmm
|
Posted 7/15/09 9:53 AM |
|
|
Mommy2Boys
My Boys!!!!
Member since 6/06 14437 total posts
Name: C
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
She had to be more than 135 lbs during that movie. I was thinking 150+
|
Posted 7/15/09 10:12 AM |
|
|
Cpt2007
A new love!
Member since 1/08 5946 total posts
Name: Liz
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
Posted by CrankyPants
I am excited there will be a third movie-I love them.
However, there wasn't a third book, was there?
As for the "full figured" comments-that has been going on since this started. It's annoying to think that someone around 130lbs would be considered full figured, but not enough as to end my love of these movies.
no, there wasn't a third book. i wonder who is writing the script for this one...
|
Posted 7/15/09 10:17 AM |
|
|
smdl
I love Gary too..on a plate!
Member since 5/06 32461 total posts
Name: me
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
Posted by CrankyPants
I am excited there will be a third movie-I love them.
However, there wasn't a third book, was there?
As for the "full figured" comments-that has been going on since this started. It's annoying to think that someone around 130lbs would be considered full figured, but not enough as to end my love of these movies.
Oh! I still would watch the movie. I can't miss a fight of guys fighting like girls. The kicking in the air. I love it!!!!
ETA: allegebly she gained 20-30 Lbs ONLY for those movies. She is very petite so any weight gain would be very visible. But if you look at her thight they are not THAT big in the movie.
Message edited 7/15/2009 10:53:34 AM.
|
Posted 7/15/09 10:45 AM |
|
|
anonttcer
BOOOO for fall!
Member since 7/06 10082 total posts
Name: Meaning a NON ttcer!
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
Posted by jellybean1420
She had to be more than 135 lbs during that movie. I was thinking 150+
Remember though- when the press announces weights of these women it's always skewed down. Just like Kim K is a size 2. And every woman in Hollywood weighs 110 pounds.
I think they sign some sort of agreement that all weights and sizes will be reported at least 2 sizes and 15 pounds lower!
|
Posted 7/15/09 11:30 AM |
|
|
leighla
Support Cancer Research
Member since 5/05 16353 total posts
Name: Lauren
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
Posted by Cpt2007
Posted by CrankyPants
I am excited there will be a third movie-I love them.
However, there wasn't a third book, was there?
no, there wasn't a third book. i wonder who is writing the script for this one...
It says it's based on her newspaper columns.
|
Posted 7/15/09 11:32 AM |
|
|
BlueDiamonds
mommy to 3 boys
Member since 2/07 3885 total posts
Name: proud mommy
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
the movie talks about her weight periodically (around 135 lbs i think), as part of her diary. not sure if that was really her true weight though...
|
Posted 7/15/09 2:03 PM |
|
|
randella
Love my little man
Member since 8/05 16290 total posts
Name: Randi
|
Re: Renée Zellweger to Pack It On Again for Bridget Jones
I think I remember the first movie-- she weighed 130-something, but she is also probably lilliputian. Although I did not think she looked heavy AT ALL in the first one.
The second one, she looked HORRIBLE. Not really her body, but her face. She looked like she probably put on more weight.
In the book-- they talk about weight every day, but I mean that's so relative with height, body shape, etc. It's also the character's weight, not Renee's.
ETA-- I am excited for a third Bridget Jones though!!! I love Colin Firth!
Message edited 7/15/2009 7:29:54 PM.
|
Posted 7/15/09 7:29 PM |
|
|