| Posted By |
Message |
| Pages: [1] 2 |
BabyHopes2
LIF Adult
Member since 4/13 1058 total posts
Name:
|
Ugh not good news. Update.
I guess I spoke too soon...My beta levels are going down. On Tuesday it was 74,000 and today went to 60,000. I am 4 weeks today, aren't those numbers high? I am realizing its not good but do I still have hope? Did this happen to anyone and was fine?
Message edited 8/15/2014 12:46:40 PM.
|
Posted 8/14/14 12:43 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
bunnyluck
LIF Adult
Member since 1/14 3196 total posts
Name:
|
Ugh not good news.
Sorry I have no advice...Just wanted to send a hug and prayers!!! .
|
| Posted 8/14/14 12:48 PM |
| |
|
jessnbrian
Only God knows His plan for us
Member since 4/13 7238 total posts
Name:
Jessica
|
Ugh not good news.
I'm so sorry! Those numbers are high, but when they start going down that's a bad sign. I hope the best for you, but take it one day at a time.
|
| Posted 8/14/14 12:51 PM |
| |
|
Michelle1110
My family is complete
Member since 1/12 2338 total posts
Name:
|
Ugh not good news.
Who is your nurse there? And what did they say? They NEVER gave me false hope.
|
| Posted 8/14/14 1:09 PM |
| |
|
Bearcat
Love my little girls!!! <3
Member since 6/10 10818 total posts
Name:
E
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
Those numbers are extremely high- outside of the normal range for 4 weeks (beta range 5-426). Did they say anything about how high they are?
Sending you lots of 
|
| Posted 8/14/14 1:25 PM |
| |
|
BsMomma2014
Fly high little one
Member since 6/10 2662 total posts
Name:
nicole
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
Posted by Bearcat
Those numbers are extremely high- outside of the normal range for 4 weeks (beta range 5-426). Did they say anything about how high they are?
Sending you lots of
I agree those numbers seem high for 4 weeks, I would still keep some hope. Good Luck
|
| Posted 8/14/14 1:33 PM |
| |
|
BabyHopes2
LIF Adult
Member since 4/13 1058 total posts
Name:
|
Ugh not good news.
Thank you all...don't sure which nurse I spoke too but she said more than likely it's not a good sign. Going in for sono tomorrow to make sure it's not Ecoptic. I'm not sure what was normal they didn't tell me my numbers on Tuesday just that it was positive and good numbers. I'll give them a call now to ask.
|
| Posted 8/14/14 1:34 PM |
| |
|
BabyHopes2
LIF Adult
Member since 4/13 1058 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
Well I called and they said 74,000 is a normal range lol. So I'll just wait and see tomorrow.
|
| Posted 8/14/14 1:40 PM |
| |
|
BsMomma2014
Fly high little one
Member since 6/10 2662 total posts
Name:
nicole
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
Posted by BabyHopes2
Well I called and they said 74,000 is a normal range lol. So I'll just wait and see tomorrow.
I think I was 16,000 at 6-7 weeks and only 420 around 5 weeks
|
| Posted 8/14/14 2:09 PM |
| |
|
Lillies
Grateful for my babies!
Member since 2/12 4571 total posts
Name:
<3
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
That is in no way a normal range for 4 weeks. I believe at 5 weeks I was between 3,000-7,000 and that was considered high. I would ask about possible ectopic or molar pregnancy. Def have them monitor you very closely. I'm so sorry you are going through this!
Message edited 8/14/2014 2:27:50 PM.
|
| Posted 8/14/14 2:18 PM |
| |
|
TyReseGreen
Lil Prince is here
Member since 8/11 6338 total posts
Name:
Theresa
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
74,000 is really high for 4 weeks below is a beta chart
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Levels
From Conception hCG Level
0-1 Weeks 0 - 50 mIU/ml
1-2 Weeks 40 - 300 mIU/ml
3-4 Weeks 500 - 6,000 mIU/ml
1-2 Months 5,000 - 200,000 mIU/ml
2-3 Months 10,000 - 100,000 mIU/ml
2nd Trimester 3,000 - 50,000 mIU/ml
3rd Trimester 1,000 - 50,000 mIU/ml
Non-Pregnant Women < 5.0 mIU/ml
Postmenopausal Women
|
| Posted 8/14/14 2:21 PM |
| |
|
TyReseGreen
Lil Prince is here
Member since 8/11 6338 total posts
Name:
Theresa
|
Ugh not good news.
I hope everything works out for you.
|
| Posted 8/14/14 2:22 PM |
| |
|
Michelle1110
My family is complete
Member since 1/12 2338 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
Posted by Lillies
That is in no way a normal range for 4 weeks. I believe at 5 weeks I was between 3,000-7,000 and that was considered high. I would ask about possible ectopic or molar pregnancy. Def have them monitor you very closely. I'm so sorry you are going through this!
I agree. Maybe this is why they want you in for a sono? I was with them for two cycles of beta hell, and they were always honest with me regarding outcomes. Call back and ask to speak with dr.
With my current pregnancy, I was 6,800 at 6 weeks.
|
| Posted 8/14/14 3:06 PM |
| |
|
Mrs213
????????
Member since 2/09 18986 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
|
| Posted 8/14/14 8:39 PM |
| |
|
summerBaby10
let's be nice
Member since 9/07 10208 total posts
Name:
Wifey
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
 Hoping for the best!
|
| Posted 8/14/14 9:25 PM |
| |
|
maybebaby
LIF Adult
Member since 11/05 6870 total posts
Name:
Maureen
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
While the numbers are high, the fact that they dropped isn't good (not trying to be negative, just factual). I've been through it once..it stinks. I'm sorry this is happening!! 
|
| Posted 8/15/14 8:48 AM |
| |
|
fashiong1rl
LIF Adolescent
Member since 3/14 689 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ugh not good news.
hoping for the best
|
| Posted 8/15/14 9:39 AM |
| |
|
BabyHopes2
LIF Adult
Member since 4/13 1058 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ugh not good news - Update
Well my number was not 74,000 it was 74. I told Dr. Brenner the nurse said 74,000 and I called back to confirm. He apologized and said it's 74 went down to 60 it's a chemical pregnancy. I'm relieved it wasn't a molar based on those false numbers. Thanks you all for words and support.
If you had a chemical how long after did you have a true pregnancy?
|
| Posted 8/15/14 12:46 PM |
| |
|
jessnbrian
Only God knows His plan for us
Member since 4/13 7238 total posts
Name:
Jessica
|
Re: Ugh not good news. Update.
Posted by BabyHopes2
Well my number was not 74,000 it was 74. I told Dr. Brenner the nurse said 74,000 and I called back to confirm. He apologized and said it's 74 went down to 60 it's a chemical pregnancy. I'm relieved it wasn't a molar based on those false numbers. Thanks you all for words and support.
If you had a chemical how long after did you have a true pregnancy?
i had a mc at 6 weeks in May of last year (may 1st I mc'ed), then I had a chemical in August. I got my BFP earlier this year in the end of March/Beginning of April. I'm 24 weeks tomorrow.
|
| Posted 8/15/14 12:55 PM |
| |
|
Michelle1110
My family is complete
Member since 1/12 2338 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ugh not good news. Update.
Posted by BabyHopes2
Well my number was not 74,000 it was 74. I told Dr. Brenner the nurse said 74,000 and I called back to confirm. He apologized and said it's 74 went down to 60 it's a chemical pregnancy. I'm relieved it wasn't a molar based on those false numbers. Thanks you all for words and support.
If you had a chemical how long after did you have a true pregnancy?
Chemical in September
Chemical in October
Took November off to do further testing
BFP in December..35 weeks now.
I LOVE Dr. Brenner. See- told ya to call him 
One thing from experiencing all of this - IMHO you are in the best care possible with him. He will not rest until he finds out the issue (if there was one) and gets you pregnant.
FM if you want to talk.
|
| Posted 8/15/14 1:03 PM |
| |
|
BsMomma2014
Fly high little one
Member since 6/10 2662 total posts
Name:
nicole
|
Ugh not good news. Update.
I am so sorry
|
| Posted 8/15/14 1:12 PM |
| |
|
JSDB
<3
Member since 1/13 1329 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ugh not good news. Update.
I'm so sorry for your loss but am relieved to hear your true numbers, I was also worrying about a possible molar pregnancy.
As far as how long to get pregnant again, I had a chemical in late June, BFN late July, BFP late August (which ended up a later loss due to a chromosomal abnormality), tried again in Nov and had another chemical that cycle, then another BFN, and then a BFP the cycle after. I am 31 weeks today 
|
| Posted 8/15/14 1:57 PM |
| |
|
GoodThoughts
Dreams do come true
Member since 2/12 2259 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Ugh not good news. Update.
I had a chemical in September. BFP in December from the next IVF cycle.
I'm sorry
|
| Posted 8/15/14 2:15 PM |
| |
|
Bearcat
Love my little girls!!! <3
Member since 6/10 10818 total posts
Name:
E
|
Re: Ugh not good news. Update.
I'm so sorry. Thankfully it wasn't a molar pregnancy. Wishing you all the best.
|
| Posted 8/15/14 2:30 PM |
| |
|
mrsb1
LIF Toddler
Member since 2/10 423 total posts
Name:
las1 from LIW
|
Ugh not good news. Update.
I am so sorry
|
| Posted 8/15/14 3:04 PM |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
