| Posted By |
Message |
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
Goldi0218
My miracles!
Member since 12/05 23902 total posts
Name:
Leslie
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
At my age 2.
Ten years ago Id say 4.
There are too many risks at my age. Even if all went well, I would not have enough energy for 4 kids at this stage of my life. I would prefer not to have a child past 40.
|
Posted 9/26/06 8:57 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
hazeleyes33
LIF Adult
Member since 5/05 13060 total posts
Name:
Ginger
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Posted by emilain
Posted by hazeleyes33
We have 2 and I would not have more. I don't know if people realize how hard it is to have children. Unless you are super lax and nothing bothers you, it's not easy when you have a bunch of kids whining and crying. Babies are cute, but those babies turn into kids who need discipline.
sooo true, I say not until you have 3 do you realize the chaos, 2 is still managable if you have a husband, but when you have 3, you;re outnumbered, 1 needs something to drink, the oter is whining and the baby needs to be breastfed, UGH, I remmeber the days well . Oh, and then the dog would throw up and the phone would ring
ETA: 2 kids are still overwhelming, hell 1 kid is ALOT of work!!!
I agree. I watch my nephew sometimes and my son and him are only 3 months apart and I don't know if I am coming or going-lol!!
My daughter is very hyper so she is more difficult than my son but all they do is fight and it drives us nuts!! We are sooooooo done-lol!!
Also, I LOVE to spend time alone with my dh and doing adult things.
|
| Posted 9/26/06 8:57 PM |
| |
|
JennChris
life moves fast
Member since 5/05 4225 total posts
Name:
Jenn
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
money wasn't a factor for us, 3 is a good number for us because we feel that we can give each child enough of ourselves without streching it too much and leaving someone out... does that make sense?
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:04 PM |
| |
|
luvsbob4603
To a healthy 2013
Member since 5/05 21840 total posts
Name:
To a brand new year to a healthier me
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2 because of my age!
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:05 PM |
| |
|
BaroqueMama
Chase is one!
Member since 5/05 27530 total posts
Name:
me
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
3
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:05 PM |
| |
|
LadyPrincess
Live Life with No Regrets
Member since 5/05 2298 total posts
Name:
Chris
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:12 PM |
| |
|
SuzyQ
Mama to 3!?!?!?
Member since 7/06 8069 total posts
Name:
Susan
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
3. I think my age might be more of a factor than the money part. (I'm 35 have due to have #1 in November.) I'm still hoping to have 3, but I guess I should wait & see how it goes with one! 
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:14 PM |
| |
|
Bri
I Love You to Pieces!
Member since 5/05 9919 total posts
Name:
Brianne
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:16 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
4 for me
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:33 PM |
| |
|
Moehick
Ready for the sun!
Member since 5/05 30339 total posts
Name:
Properly perfect™
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Probably 3
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:34 PM |
| |
|
MrsRbk
<3 <3 <3 <3
Member since 1/06 19197 total posts
Name:
Michelle
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2 - not because of $$ just because I don't think I could handle more than 2 kids
but if DH had it his way, we'd have a small army
Message edited 9/26/2006 9:42:01 PM.
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:41 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
interesting question......I will go with 4
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:45 PM |
| |
|
emilain
UNREAL!!!!!!!!
Member since 5/05 4457 total posts
Name:
Mama
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
I just asked my hubby and he said 6, so we better not hit the lotto, or I have 3 more kids to birth
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:45 PM |
| |
|
LIBOUND
Texting king
Member since 10/05 5289 total posts
Name:
Suzy
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2. Preferably of the same sex. But you didnt' ask that
|
| Posted 9/26/06 9:45 PM |
| |
|
dpli
Daylight savings :)
Member since 5/05 13973 total posts
Name:
D
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Posted by Goldi0218
At my age 2.
Ten years ago Id say 4.
There are too many risks at my age. Even if all went well, I would not have enough energy for 4 kids at this stage of my life. I would prefer not to have a child past 40.
This is my answer almost exactly. I think at this point I might only want one.
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:03 PM |
| |
|
nrthshgrl
It goes fast. Pay attention.
Member since 7/05 57538 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
4 or 5
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:12 PM |
| |
|
FeliciaDP
♥
Member since 5/05 18599 total posts
Name:
Mommy
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
if I was younger and had $$, I'd go for 4
as it is, DH wants 3 and I'm not sure how much time I have for that (I'm 36 and just about to have my 1st!)
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:13 PM |
| |
|
Eireann
Two ladies and a gentleman!
Member since 5/05 12165 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
3 which is probably what we'll have.
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:14 PM |
| |
|
emilain
UNREAL!!!!!!!!
Member since 5/05 4457 total posts
Name:
Mama
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Posted by dpli
Posted by Goldi0218
At my age 2.
Ten years ago Id say 4.
There are too many risks at my age. Even if all went well, I would not have enough energy for 4 kids at this stage of my life. I would prefer not to have a child past 40.
This is my answer almost exactly. I think at this point I might only want one.
I think 1 can be PERFECT!!!
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:14 PM |
| |
|
05mommy09
Family of 5!
Member since 5/05 15364 total posts
Name:
<3 Mommy <3
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Honestly- I think 6
I love being a mother- and would love to have a big family
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:16 PM |
| |
|
Baboots
I miss you grandma
Member since 8/05 1437 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
4
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:16 PM |
| |
|
jnico
LIF Adolescent
Member since 10/05 798 total posts
Name:
Joanne
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
I always wanted 4 and still do. But I may settle with three since time is flying by!
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:17 PM |
| |
|
MrsS2005
Mom of 3
Member since 11/05 13118 total posts
Name:
B
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
3
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:24 PM |
| |
|
julz33
i run for bacon
Member since 5/05 20584 total posts
Name:
julz
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
3
same as I want now
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:25 PM |
| |
|
lucyloo
nope
Member since 1/06 9758 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
1 maybe 2 and it wouldn't matter how rich I was.
|
| Posted 9/26/06 10:29 PM |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
