| Posted By |
Message |
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
|
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
I say 4 but I have to see how we do with each one.
|
Posted 9/26/06 11:03 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
ggt08
;)
Member since 5/05 5208 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
i would like 2 or 3, whether I have money or not. would like my sanity as well. just dont think i could handle more..
I am the oldest of 6... it was tough
|
| Posted 9/26/06 11:34 PM |
| |
|
SweetTooth
I'm a tired mommy!
Member since 12/05 20105 total posts
Name:
Lauren
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
hmm... maybe 3
|
| Posted 9/26/06 11:35 PM |
| |
|
beachgirl13
Mommy to 3 boys!
Member since 5/05 4114 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
4
|
| Posted 9/26/06 11:36 PM |
| |
|
Stefanie
♥
Member since 5/05 23599 total posts
Name:
Stefanie
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
4. I would love to have a big family.
|
| Posted 9/26/06 11:44 PM |
| |
|
Elizabeth
Mom of Three
Member since 9/05 7900 total posts
Name:
"MOMMY!!!"
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Posted by emilain
Posted by hazeleyes33
We have 2 and I would not have more. I don't know if people realize how hard it is to have children. Unless you are super lax and nothing bothers you, it's not easy when you have a bunch of kids whining and crying. Babies are cute, but those babies turn into kids who need discipline.
sooo true, I say not until you have 3 do you realize the chaos, 2 is still managable if you have a husband, but when you have 3, you;re outnumbered, 1 needs something to drink, the oter is whining and the baby needs to be breastfed, UGH, I remmeber the days well . Oh, and then the dog would throw up and the phone would ring
ETA: 2 kids are still overwhelming, hell 1 kid is ALOT of work!!!
My life to a T. We are so outnumbered, they gang up on us. The worst is in the morning when I am alone with them. They all need everything at once and of course Im in my morning fog cursing myself that I didnt get the coffee pot ready to go the night before.
|
| Posted 9/27/06 12:47 AM |
| |
|
skip123
Trying...
Member since 8/06 2759 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
If money (or my age) was not a factor I would really love 4 children...but I am hoping to have 2..(God willing)
|
| Posted 9/27/06 12:52 AM |
| |
|
moonlithaze
LIF Adolescent
Member since 5/06 667 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2 possibly 3
|
| Posted 9/27/06 1:40 AM |
| |
|
Ambersmom
Straight up nasty
Member since 5/05 7740 total posts
Name:
Sharon
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Posted by johnsae
i could have all the money in the world, but i would still need my sanity. no more than 3.
Amen!! I give you Mommies with the big families LOTS of credit
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:11 AM |
| |
|
chikita315
Love
Member since 8/06 7945 total posts
Name:
M-lo
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
3 I think would be my max
Sanity is as big a factor as money
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Kissy331
My two miracles!
Member since 5/06 17826 total posts
Name:
Kristen
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
We are planning on 2 but if we end up w/2 of the same sex, then we are going for the 3rd. I know that is the most I could handle
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:15 AM |
| |
|
Wendy
Wheeee!
Member since 5/05 13736 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Could I get back ten years of my life first?  At almost 39, I don't think more than two would be realistic.
But if I was younger, I'd say probably four ...
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:18 AM |
| |
|
mommy2bella
Where does time go?
Member since 12/05 9747 total posts
Name:
Kelly
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Posted by kdelace
i would like 2 or 3, whether I have money or not. would like my sanity as well. just dont think i could handle more..
I am the oldest of 6... it was tough
same here...I am the 3rd of that 6 and growing up wasn't the most fun...now it's great most of the time (but still always some type of drama at ALL times)
Just think of when your sister or brother has an issue and multiply that by 6 and add the fact that all 6 of us are drama queens
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:25 AM |
| |
|
Ophelia
she's baaccckkkk ;)
Member since 5/06 23378 total posts
Name:
remember, when Gulliver traveled....
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
I'd still say 1, maybe 2 MAX
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:30 AM |
| |
|
DonnaJoe708
Hello
Member since 5/05 4002 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2 or 3.
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:30 AM |
| |
|
2PreciousBlessings
The Perfect Pair
Member since 5/06 19861 total posts
Name:
Best Wife & Mommy
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Before I only want one child but then DH would like two so now I will say two for me. No more than two.
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:36 AM |
| |
|
Tany
Becoming a different woman
Member since 5/05 24460 total posts
Name:
Tania
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
one more although right now I'm content with just one.
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:37 AM |
| |
|
twobabies
Praying
Member since 7/05 9662 total posts
Name:
Mrs. Honeybee
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:38 AM |
| |
|
LuckySV
LIF Adult
Member since 10/05 4675 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Posted by Beth1210
still just 2- my choice has nothing to do with money- I have always just wanted 2
Same here.
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:40 AM |
| |
|
Waste06
Waste not, want not
Member since 6/06 7219 total posts
Name:
Lois Mom Mommy Mama Ma
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:43 AM |
| |
|
usuk2004
I'm ONE!
Member since 5/05 5150 total posts
Name:
Farah
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
2 would be ideal. 3 would be my absolute max, as in if second pregnancy was twins...but that would be the only way we'd end up with more than 2
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:43 AM |
| |
|
babymakes3
Almost there!
Member since 7/06 7376 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
I don't think we'll have more than 2-3 if money wasn't a factor. However, I would look into adopting up to 2 or 3 more children.
|
| Posted 9/27/06 10:48 AM |
| |
|
antoinette
boy mamma
Member since 5/05 2975 total posts
Name:
Antoinette
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
I always wanted four, then I had a baby so now Im saying tops 3. I love kids but they are alot of work and since Im a control freak I doubt I would get a nanny even if money wasnt an issue. Although I would def get a live in housekeeper.
|
| Posted 9/27/06 11:15 AM |
| |
|
sirk1020
*************
Member since 9/06 3046 total posts
Name:
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
if money is not a factor probably 4
if money and age was not a factor probably 5
|
| Posted 9/27/06 11:56 AM |
| |
|
lorich
.
Member since 6/05 9987 total posts
Name:
Grammie says "Lora Gina"
|
Re: If money was not a factor...
Two or three. I really am praying for one of each.
|
| Posted 9/27/06 11:57 AM |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
