| Posted By |
Message |
| Pages: [1] 2 |
DUCKS2001
Then there was 2
Member since 3/06 5696 total posts
Name:
Christine
|
johnsons shampoo not good!
johnsons head to toe wash and shampoo are rated a 5 on a scale 1-10 .. it carries plaetes(sp)
also costco and bjs wipes are poor and the best rated at a 0 are seventh generation wipes
|
Posted 2/12/08 2:54 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
LIMOMx2
...
Member since 5/05 24989 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
I knew that about J&J but not about the wipes. Thanks
|
| Posted 2/12/08 2:55 PM |
| |
|
MST9106
My life:)
Member since 6/06 9589 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Can we have the source to get more info? Thanks.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 2:55 PM |
| |
|
Marcie
Complete Happiness :)
Member since 5/05 27789 total posts
Name:
LOVE being a Mommy!
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
I look at it - it didn't kill us as we were kids, how bad can it really be?
|
| Posted 2/12/08 2:56 PM |
| |
|
pinkandblue
Our family is complete, maybe
Member since 9/05 32436 total posts
Name:
Stephanie
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by Marcie
I look at it - it didn't kill us as we were kids, how bad can it really be?
I agree, we all survived
|
| Posted 2/12/08 2:57 PM |
| |
|
Bklyngrl
luvmyfamily
Member since 9/06 5307 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
i use the head to toe on DD - - should i be worried?? what are plataes? she's been fine with it 
|
| Posted 2/12/08 2:58 PM |
| |
|
2BEANS
wow time is going fast.
Member since 9/07 16106 total posts
Name:
Tina
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by stephanief
Posted by Marcie
I look at it - it didn't kill us as we were kids, how bad can it really be?
I agree, we all survived
not disagreeing but.. was the formula the same from when we were kids? Things change over time.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 2:59 PM |
| |
|
LIMOMx2
...
Member since 5/05 24989 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by stephanief
Posted by Marcie
I look at it - it didn't kill us as we were kids, how bad can it really be?
I agree, we all survived
I do feel though that there are more cases of cancer and other diseases now then before so this can all be a factor in that.
I figure, better safe then sorry.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 2:59 PM |
| |
|
LuvMy2Girls
@>---------
Member since 5/05 11165 total posts
Name:
Mommy
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
I'm not even touching the subject matter...
But can you post where you saw this?
Thanks! 
|
| Posted 2/12/08 3:04 PM |
| |
|
dandr10199
Grace is growing up too fast!
Member since 10/05 11561 total posts
Name:
Dina
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by BabySammie
not disagreeing but.. was the formula the same from when we were kids? Things change over time.
YES, things and companies DO change. J & J was a smaller company, manufactured everything in the US back then. Now, some of their stuff is made overseas.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 3:05 PM |
| |
|
LIMOMx2
...
Member since 5/05 24989 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by sweetness
I'm not even touching the subject matter...
But can you post where you saw this?
Thanks!
I use the Skin Deep Website.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 3:11 PM |
| |
|
babymakes3
Almost there!
Member since 7/06 7376 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
BJs and Costco wipes are poor in performance or poor because they contain chemicals?
Please post the source.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 3:11 PM |
| |
|
LuvMy2Girls
@>---------
Member since 5/05 11165 total posts
Name:
Mommy
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by 5ofClubs
Posted by sweetness
I'm not even touching the subject matter...
But can you post where you saw this?
Thanks!
I use the Skin Deep Website.
Thanks! I googled it-is that basically Skin deep-cosmetics database?
I searched for J&J and all the name brand wipes like huggies, pampers, target, cvs, Kirkland and they all score in the moderate range 3-6-whatever they consider moderate range for what, toxicity? toxins? cancer causing?
What's their rating scale based on?
I hate this, i really hate these things and these studies making me 2nd guess that i'm not doing what's best for my kids.
sometimes i feel we are taking steps back with modern conveniences than moving forward.
Heres a link
Skin Deep?
Off topic-Do you guys look at the labels on what you put in and on your own bodies?
Message edited 2/12/2008 3:26:59 PM.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 3:22 PM |
| |
|
bicosi
life is a carousel
Member since 7/07 14956 total posts
Name:
M
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by stephanief
Posted by Marcie
I look at it - it didn't kill us as we were kids, how bad can it really be?
I agree, we all survived
Seriously.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 3:48 PM |
| |
|
Ladybug63
Ohh... baby
Member since 5/06 2527 total posts
Name:
D
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
I try to use the lower level products for stuff like lotions & bath soap. I figure why not. I use California Baby sold at Target usually but also use J & J bed time bath wash.
There was an article in a paper recently (MIL cut it out so not sure what paper) it basically said Dr.'s don't agree but that some ingredients are harmful in higher doses. I think it also has to do with absorption. If your soaking in a tub, lotions but not so much for things like shampoo & toothpaste.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 4:00 PM |
| |
|
pmpkn087
Life is good...
Member since 9/05 18504 total posts
Name:
Stephanie
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
I don't stress too much about stuff like this. He is not ingesting it and if he does ingest the water there is such a small amount.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 5:03 PM |
| |
|
jules
Changing everyday
Member since 1/08 2281 total posts
Name:
julia
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
I can't be bothered freaking out over this.
With all the issues with the lead paint in the toys, the boppy's and bumbos gone bad and the big NO NO of the heating of the toxic, non-BPA bottles, I think I am going to let the J&J "5" rating slide
|
| Posted 2/12/08 5:44 PM |
| |
|
Diana1215
Living on a prayer!!!
Member since 10/05 29450 total posts
Name:
Diana
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by jules
I can't be bothered freaking out over this.
With all the issues with the lead paint in the toys, the boppy's and bumbos gone bad and the big NO NO of the heating of the toxic, non-BPA bottles, I think I am going to let the J&J "5" rating slide
|
| Posted 2/12/08 5:46 PM |
| |
|
lcherian
He is the reason!
Member since 2/06 2512 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by 5ofClubs
Posted by stephanief
Posted by Marcie
I look at it - it didn't kill us as we were kids, how bad can it really be?
I agree, we all survived
I do feel though that there are more cases of cancer and other diseases now then before so this can all be a factor in that.
I figure, better safe then sorry.
i agree. plus, you don't know the long term effects of using these products.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 6:04 PM |
| |
|
Aga
hello baby Albert
Member since 9/05 7750 total posts
Name:
Aga
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
we really dont know a lot of things about cancer, if only it would be that easy as not using a shampoo...
I freaked out about lots of things in the beginning but right now I just refuse to be paranoid about some things...
|
| Posted 2/12/08 6:06 PM |
| |
|
cjik
Welcome 2010!
Member since 2/06 8879 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Thanks for posting the link--I'm trying to avoid exposing DS to this stuff.
No, these shampoos did kill us, but was this chemical in them? Also, this affects fertility in men I believe, so look at all the people who have a hard time conceiving these days. So no, they didn't kill us, but it's possible they did harm us.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 6:37 PM |
| |
|
DUCKS2001
Then there was 2
Member since 3/06 5696 total posts
Name:
Christine
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by sweetness
Posted by 5ofClubs
Posted by sweetness
I'm not even touching the subject matter...
But can you post where you saw this?
Thanks!
I use the Skin Deep Website.
Thanks! I googled it-is that basically Skin deep-cosmetics database?
I searched for J&J and all the name brand wipes like huggies, pampers, target, cvs, Kirkland and they all score in the moderate range 3-6-whatever they consider moderate range f
or what, toxicity? toxins? cancer causing?
What's their rating scale based on?
I hate this, i really hate these things and these studies making me 2nd guess that i'm not doing what's best for my kids.
sometimes i feel we are taking steps back with modern conveniences than moving forward.
Heres a link
Skin Deep?
Off topic-Do you guys look at the labels on what you put in and on your own bodies?
yes thats the source!!
|
| Posted 2/12/08 8:59 PM |
| |
|
ckone
LIF Adult
Member since 8/06 3014 total posts
Name:
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by cjik
Thanks for posting the link--I'm trying to avoid exposing DS to this stuff.
No, these shampoos did kill us, but was this chemical in them? Also, this affects fertility in men I believe, so look at all the people who have a hard time conceiving these days. So no, they didn't kill us, but it's possible they did harm us.
I think that mostly everything that is not organic/all natural has the potential to harm people but what can we do be afraid of everything?
As for issues such as conception I think there are many other things that contribute to this but that's for another board.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 9:29 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
It has what???
|
| Posted 2/12/08 9:31 PM |
| |
|
MsMBV
:P
Member since 5/05 28602 total posts
Name:
Me
|
Re: johnsons shampoo not good!
Posted by sweetness
Off topic-Do you guys look at the labels on what you put in and on your own bodies?
Yes. I am pretty much a label-reader.
|
| Posted 2/12/08 9:38 PM |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
