|
| Posted By |
Message |
| Pages: << 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 >> |
Celt
~~~~~~~~~~
Member since 4/08 7758 total posts
Name:
colette
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
It's alllllllll part of the illusion, peeps. She, her DH and her legal team have had about 6 months prep leading up to every single photo, every single interview. Her arrest last week was a shock to US, but not to them. She KNEW this was going to go down so right now they are all playing their parts.
Which is fine and all, but only 2 sick a-holes would allow their 3 YEAR OLD CHILD to be used as a prop in this mess.
And her oh-so-loyal-today-DH will be gone once the hoopla is over, wait and see.
|
Posted 6/3/12 11:14 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
wasn't this crazy B going to sue LIF or was in talks with lawyers for the bum hand fiasco? something about tarnishing her image?
or am I mistaken?
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:15 PM |
| |
|
MC09
arrrghhh!!!!
Member since 2/09 5674 total posts
Name:
Me speaks pirate!
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by lipglossjunky73
Posted by cncforever
Posted by DiamondGirl
Posted by MC09
In this last pic it looks almost like she thinks she's some celebrity being followed by the paparazzi, like she's welcoming them with a big old smile... B*tch, you're being accused of molesting children, you're not being followed by TMZ down rodeo drive! This chick really is delusional!
she could secure herself high paying interviews...book deals....$$$$$$$$$$
Think anyone would read that story?????? 
Can she even write with that bum hand of hers???
 Judging by her last rant/post, hope she uses spell check at least!
She totally looks like she's looking to cash in on all this. Sick f*ck!!! Kool-aid smile...
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:15 PM |
| |
|
MC09
arrrghhh!!!!
Member since 2/09 5674 total posts
Name:
Me speaks pirate!
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by cncforever
wasn't this crazy B going to sue LIF or was in talks with lawyers for the bum hand fiasco? something about tarnishing her image?
or am I mistaken?
Hmmm don't know about any of that... but she sure doesn't seem too concerned with her tarnished image as a statutory rapist in the heels of child molestation accusations. I think babymakin is more concerned than she is! lol
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:17 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
I want a lawyer up in hurr.
What is the least punishment she could receive?
and what is the highest? What do you predict.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:17 PM |
| |
|
Celt
~~~~~~~~~~
Member since 4/08 7758 total posts
Name:
colette
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by cncforever
I want a lawyer up in hurr.
What is the least punishment she could receive?
and what is the highest? What do you predict.
She's facing 4 years jail time.
I predict she cops a plea and serves nil.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:21 PM |
| |
|
MC09
arrrghhh!!!!
Member since 2/09 5674 total posts
Name:
Me speaks pirate!
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by colette
It's alllllllll part of the illusion, peeps. She, her DH and her legal team have had about 6 months prep leading up to every single photo, every single interview. Her arrest last week was a shock to US, but not to them. She KNEW this was going to go down so right now they are all playing their parts.
Which is fine and all, but only 2 sick a-holes would allow their 3 YEAR OLD CHILD to be used as a prop in this mess.
And her oh-so-loyal-today-DH will be gone once the hoopla is over, wait and see.
It does look very orchestrated and scripted. The image of the "perfect" family (one where the mom doesn't sit on 16-year-old boners) out for a leisurely Sunday stroll. But, seriously, stay indoors and get that kid out of the frenzy of cameras you nutjob! I also predict that husband of hers is going to vanish... he'd be a fool not to!
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:23 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
I kind of want this to be my avatar.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:26 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by colette
Posted by cncforever
I want a lawyer up in hurr.
What is the least punishment she could receive?
and what is the highest? What do you predict.
She's facing 4 years jail time.
I predict she cops a plea and serves nil.
What would/could the plea include? register sex offender, probation?
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:27 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by cncforever
I want a lawyer up in hurr.
What is the least punishment she could receive?
and what is the highest? What do you predict.
per WEBCRIMS, list of charges for Erin Sayar is below. I will try to find out from my crim. lawyer friends which sentences could run concurrently, if any. The top charge is an E felony, which carries up to 4 years. A class A misdemanor can carry up to a year. The # of charges & counts may make it easier for her to plea out, guilty to some in exchange for not guilty for others. Also, I think it will be tough to prove every single count. She was charged with 8 counts on so many of these. Then again, there could be charges added after more investigation. Here goes the laundry list of charges.
PS....personally I wonder about her mental competence and that could come into play.
PL 260.10 01
A Misdemeanor, 4 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Act Manr Injur Child < 17
PL 130.25 02
**TOP CHARGE**
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Rape Intrcrse:fem<17,m>21
PL 130.40 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Crim Sexact3:actor>21victim<17
PL 130.20 01
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Misconduct
PL 130.20 01
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Misconduct
PL 130.20 02
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sex Miscon: Oral/anal Conduct
PL 130.20 02
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sex Miscon: Oral/anal Conduct
PL 130.55 00
B Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Abuse 3rd
PL 130.25 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Rape Intrcrse:fem<17,m>21
PL 130.40 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Crim Sexact3:actor>21victim<17
PL 130.55 00
B Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Abuse 3rd
PL 130.55 00
B Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Abuse 3rd
PL 221.05 00
Violation, 3 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Unlaw Poss Marihuana
Weapon/Drug:Marihuana
PL 130.25 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Rape Intrcrse:fem<17,m>21
PL 130.40 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Crim Sexact3:actor>21victim<17
PL 130.20 01
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Misconduct
PL 260.10 01
A Misdemeanor, 4 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Act Manr Injur Child < 17
PL 130.40 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Crim Sexact3:actor>21victim<17
PL 130.20 01
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Misconduct
PL 130.20 02
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sex Miscon: Oral/anal Conduct
PL 130.20 02
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sex Miscon: Oral/anal Conduct
PL 130.40 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Crim Sexact3:actor>21victim<17
PL 130.40 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Crim Sexact3:actor>21victim<17
PL 130.20 01
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Misconduct
PL 130.20 02
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sex Miscon: Oral/anal Conduct
PL 130.55 00
B Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Abuse 3rd
PL 130.55 00
B Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Abuse 3rd
PL 260.10 01
A Misdemeanor, 4 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Act Manr Injur Child < 17
PL 130.25 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Rape Intrcrse:fem<17,m>21
PL 130.40 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Crim Sexact3:actor>21victim<17
PL 130.20 01
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Misconduct
PL 130.20 01
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Misconduct
PL 130.20 02
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sex Miscon: Oral/anal Conduct
PL 130.55 00
B Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Abuse 3rd
PL 260.10 01
A Misdemeanor, 4 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Act Manr Injur Child < 17
PL 130.25 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Rape Intrcrse:fem<17,m>21
PL 130.25 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Rape Intrcrse:fem<17,m>21
PL 130.25 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Rape Intrcrse:fem<17,m>21
PL 130.40 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Crim Sexact3:actor>21victim<17
PL 130.20 02
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sex Miscon: Oral/anal Conduct
PL 221.05 00
Violation, 3 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Unlaw Poss Marihuana
Weapon/Drug:Marihuana
PL 130.25 02
E Felony, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Rape Intrcrse:fem<17,m>21
PL 130.20 01
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Misconduct
PL 130.20 02
A Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sex Miscon: Oral/anal Conduct
PL 130.55 00
B Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Abuse 3rd
PL 130.55 00
B Misdemeanor, 8 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Sexual Abuse 3rd
PL 221.05 00
Violation, 3 counts, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description:Unlaw Poss Marihuana
Weapon/Drug:Marihuana
Message edited 6/3/2012 11:30:06 PM.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:29 PM |
| |
|
HeathKernandez
Our Ron is an awesome Ron
Member since 4/07 9091 total posts
Name:
baby fish mouth
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by colette
It's alllllllll part of the illusion, peeps. She, her DH and her legal team have had about 6 months prep leading up to every single photo, every single interview. Her arrest last week was a shock to US, but not to them. She KNEW this was going to go down so right now they are all playing their parts.
Which is fine and all, but only 2 sick a-holes would allow their 3 YEAR OLD CHILD to be used as a prop in this mess.
And her oh-so-loyal-today-DH will be gone once the hoopla is over, wait and see.
so you think it took him 6 months to grow that dandy mustache??? (it IS quite dandy.)
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:33 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by HeathKernandez
Posted by colette
It's alllllllll part of the illusion, peeps. She, her DH and her legal team have had about 6 months prep leading up to every single photo, every single interview. Her arrest last week was a shock to US, but not to them. She KNEW this was going to go down so right now they are all playing their parts.
Which is fine and all, but only 2 sick a-holes would allow their 3 YEAR OLD CHILD to be used as a prop in this mess.
And her oh-so-loyal-today-DH will be gone once the hoopla is over, wait and see.
so you think it took him 6 months to grow that dandy mustache??? (it IS quite dandy.)
it's .... mahhvelous.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:34 PM |
| |
|
MC09
arrrghhh!!!!
Member since 2/09 5674 total posts
Name:
Me speaks pirate!
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by cncforever
on some real shit, what the eff is with her husband?
he's like some sad charlie chaplin clown
IMAGE
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Celt
~~~~~~~~~~
Member since 4/08 7758 total posts
Name:
colette
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by cncforever
Posted by colette
Posted by cncforever
I want a lawyer up in hurr.
What is the least punishment she could receive?
and what is the highest? What do you predict.
She's facing 4 years jail time.
I predict she cops a plea and serves nil.
What would/could the plea include? register sex offender, probation?
Well, not being a lawyer I couldn't answer that definitively but they could plea bargain it down from a felony to a misdemeanor like, for example, sexual exploitation of a minor or some crap like that. Or the charges could stand, she could plead guilty, and could still walk with probation and time served.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:35 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
thank you for the court info, I didn't think to look there. I wonder how it will play out.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:36 PM |
| |
|
Celt
~~~~~~~~~~
Member since 4/08 7758 total posts
Name:
colette
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
I honestly think the kid's family made a strategic decision to forego criminal prosecution in favor of a big payout from a civil case against the DOE. Their legal team most certainly advised them that any criminal wrongdoing found would result in little to no jail time, so they went for the financial hit instead.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:39 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by colette
I honestly think the kid's family made a strategic decision to forego criminal prosecution in favor of a big payout from a civil case against the DOE. Their legal team most certainly advised them that any criminal wrongdoing found would result in little to no jail time, so they went for the financial hit instead.
Makes sense.
But when they sue the city, doesn't that suck big balls because she would never have to pay a dime of it, I assume.
|
| Posted 6/3/12 11:44 PM |
| |
|
Deedlebugs
Blessed
Member since 12/05 10281 total posts
Name:
Kiki
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by candyman
aww...mrs pb&j, myboysmyheart...i understand. you are jealous. she's hot. she's smoking hot. she's like one of the teachers who everyone knows, likes and is in love with. meanwhile youre overweight, never recovered from baby, with everyone walking by you not knowing you even exist. she's in park slope. youre out in stixvile. jealousy is so unattractive. just bc u have a bunch of hens around u who are equally jealous so they agree with u doesnt mean its okay. it's ugly behavior. whatever she really did is not good but to judge her rockstar good looks is pure delusion. now go take a jog in the park. maybe when husband comes home tonight he'll even consider holding you around that ample midsection. meoow-----
First off, apparently you did not see those horrid boudoir photos. If you did, then you would realize there is nothing "hot" there. Second, she is a pig, a dirty gross pig, who is so desperate to eff anything other than her hubby, that she is willing to bonk little boys. Third, this is not jealousy because I am 100x hotter than that baby bonker. The only thing ample on me, are my incredible boobs. TYVM... Now go find a new fedora to parade around town in.
Edited for spelling because I do not want Lori yelling at me
Message edited 6/4/2012 12:16:25 AM.
|
| Posted 6/4/12 12:13 AM |
| |
|
Celt
~~~~~~~~~~
Member since 4/08 7758 total posts
Name:
colette
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by cncforever
Posted by colette
I honestly think the kid's family made a strategic decision to forego criminal prosecution in favor of a big payout from a civil case against the DOE. Their legal team most certainly advised them that any criminal wrongdoing found would result in little to no jail time, so they went for the financial hit instead.
Makes sense.
But when they sue the city, doesn't that suck big balls because she would never have to pay a dime of it, I assume.
I'm not sure if she's even named in the suit - but I guess suing the DOE is akin to why Willie Sutton robbed banks ("that's where the money is")
As CandyDude pointed out our rockstar lives in Park Slope, but as we all know, she rents which is not very rock starry.
|
| Posted 6/4/12 6:38 AM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by colette
Posted by cncforever
Posted by colette
I honestly think the kid's family made a strategic decision to forego criminal prosecution in favor of a big payout from a civil case against the DOE. Their legal team most certainly advised them that any criminal wrongdoing found would result in little to no jail time, so they went for the financial hit instead.
Makes sense.
But when they sue the city, doesn't that suck big balls because she would never have to pay a dime of it, I assume.
I'm not sure if she's even named in the suit - but I guess suing the DOE is akin to why Willie Sutton robbed banks ("that's where the money is")
As CandyDude pointed out our rockstar lives in Park Slope, but as we all know, she rents which is not very rock starry.
Neither is wigging out aout your 20% Macy's coupon not going through online.
|
| Posted 6/4/12 6:45 AM |
| |
|
Celt
~~~~~~~~~~
Member since 4/08 7758 total posts
Name:
colette
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
And FYI it's a sad state of affairs when the UFT and their arbitrator minions can override the Schools Chancellor on matters this serious.
Mulgrew, btw, is embroiled in his OWN sex scandal - just a run-of-the-mill affair, no kids involved, but yeah, that union stinks from the top to the bottom.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/york-city-schools-chancellor-dennis-walcott-asks-teachers-union-president-pass-laws-making-easier-fire-bad-teachers-article-1.1087947 The UFT has become a legalized mafia imho.
|
| Posted 6/4/12 6:57 AM |
| |
|
DiamondGirl
You are my I love you
Member since 7/09 18802 total posts
Name:
DiamondMama
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
As a UFT member (albeit one out on childcare) I have to say it is so sad to watch predators receive protection while GOOD teachers are excessed bc of budget cuts. Maybe if the UFT spent more time looking into helping good educators the whole system would be in better shape.
|
| Posted 6/4/12 8:31 AM |
| |
|
Lisa
I'm a PANK!!!
Member since 5/05 22334 total posts
Name:
Professional Aunts No Kids
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Posted by Deedlebugs
Edited for spelling because I do not want Lori yelling at me
|
| Posted 6/4/12 9:09 AM |
| |
|
JenniferEver
The Disney Lady
Member since 5/05 18163 total posts
Name:
Jennifer
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
I think she's just setting up for a book deal and a made for TV movie. Maybe the Dh is sticking around so he gets a piece
|
| Posted 6/4/12 10:00 AM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: [elephant in the room]
Message edited 6/4/2012 2:59:52 PM.
|
| Posted 6/4/12 10:17 AM |
| |
|
| Pages: << 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 >> |
Potentially Related Topics:
Currently 289309 users on the LIFamilies.com Chat
|
Long Island Bridal Shows
|
